1. Anckar, Carsten. 2008. ‘On the Applicability of the Most Similar Systems Design and the Most Different Systems Design in Comparative Research.’ International Journal of Social Research Methodology 11, no. 5, 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401552 2. Ansolabehere, Stephen and Iyengar, Shanto. 1994. ‘Riding the Wave and Claiming Ownership over Issues - the Joint Effects of Advertising and News Coverage in Campaigns.’ Public Opinion Quarterly 58, no. 3, 335–357. 3. Arzheimer, Kai and Carter, Elisabeth. 2006. ‘Political opportunity structures and right-wing extremist party success.’ European Journal of Political Research 45, no. 3, 519–543. 4. Bale, Tim. 2003. ‘Cinderella and her ugly sisters: the mainstream and extreme right in Europe's bipolarising party systems.’ West European Politics 26, no. 3, 67–90. Bale, Tim and Green-Pedersen, Christoffer and Krouwel, André A. and Luther, Kurt Richard and Sitter, Nick. 2010. ‘If You Can't Beat Them, Join Them? Explaining Social Democratic Responses to the Challenge from the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe.’ Political Studies 58, no. 3, 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380312331280598 5. Bélanger, Éric and Meguid, Bonnie M. 2008. ‘Issue salience, issue ownership, and issue-based vote choice.’ Electoral Studies 27, no. 3, 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.001 6. Bernhard, Laurent and Kriesi, Hanspeter and Weber, Edward. 2015. ‘The populist discourse of the Swiss People's Party.’ In: European populism in the shadow of the great recession. Eds. Hanspeter Kriesi and Takis S. Pappas. Colchester: ECPR Press, 125–139. Betz, Hans-Georg. 1994. Radical right-wing populism in Western Europe. Basingstoke, Macmillan. Budge, Ian and Farlie, Dennis. 1983. Explaining and predicting elections: issue effects and party strategies in twenty-three democracies. London, Allen & Unwin. 7. Burstein, Paul. 2003. ‘The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda.’ Political Research Quarterly 56, no. 1, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600103 8. Carmines, Edward G. and Stimson, James A. 1980. ‘The Two Faces of Issue Voting.’ American Political Science Review 74, no. 1, 78–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955648 9. Dalmus, C., Hänggli, R., Bernhard, L. (2017). ‘The Charm of Salient Issues? Parties’ Strategic Behavior in Press Releases.’ In: How Political Actors use the Media. A Functional Analysis of the Media’s Role in Politics. Eds. Peter Van Aelst and Stefaan Walgrave. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 187–206. 10. Decker, Frank. 2004. Der neue Rechtspopulismus. Opladen: Leske und Budrich. Disch, Lisa. 2011. ‘Toward a Mobilization Conception of Democratic Representation.’ American Political Science Review 105, no. 1, 100–114. Downs, William M. 2001. ‘Pariahs in their midst: Belgian and Norwegian parties react to extremist threats.’ West European Politics 24, no. 3, 23–42. 11. Druckman, James N. 2014. ‘Pathologies of Studying Public Opinion, Political Communication, and Democratic Responsiveness.’ Political Communication 31, no. 3, 467–492. 12. Druckman, James N. and Hennessy, Cari Lynn and Kifer, Martin J. and Parkin, Michael. 2010. ‘Issue Engagement on Congressional Candidate Web Sites, 2002–2006.’ Social Science Computer Review 28, no. 1, 3–23. 13. Fieldhouse, Ed and Green, Jane and Evans, Geoff and Schmitt, Hermann and van der Eijk, Cees and Mellon, Jon and Prosser, Chris. 2015. British Election Study Internet Panel Wave 5 (http://www.britishelectionstudy.com/data-objects/daily-rolling-election-campaign-data/). 14. Givens, Terri E. 2002. ‘The Role of Socioeconomic Variables in the Success of Radical Right Parties.’ In: Shadows over Europe: The Development and Impact of the Extreme Right in Western Europe. Eds. Martin Schain and Aristide Zolberg and Patrick Hossay. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 137–158. 15. Green-Pedersen, Christoffer. 2007. ‘The Growing Importance of Issue Competition: The Changing Nature of Party Competition in Western Europe.’ Political Studies 55, no. 3, 607–628. Hänggli, Regula and Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2010. ‘Political Framing Strategies and Their Impact on Media Framing in a Swiss Direct-Democratic Campaign.’ Political Communication 27, no. 2, 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00686.x 16. Hawkins, Kirk A. 2010. Venezuela's Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Heinisch, Reinhard. 2003. ‘Success in opposition – failure in government: explaining the performance of right-wing populist parties in public office.’ West European Politics 26, no. 3, 91–130. 17. Hirschman, Albert O. 1991. The rhetoric of reaction: perversity, futility, jeopardy. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 18. Jerit, Jennifer. 2009. ‘How Predictive Appeals Affect Policy Opinions.’ American Journal of Political Science 53, no. 2, 411–426. Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira. 2012. ‘The ambivalence of populism: threat and corrective for democracy.’ Democratization 19, no. 2, 184–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00378.x 19. Kaplan, Noah and Park, David K. and Ridout, Travis N. 2006. ‘Dialogue in American political campaigns? An examination of issue convergence in candidate television advertising.’ American Journal of Political Science 50, no. 3, 724–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00212.x 20. Kitschelt, Herbert and McGann, Anthony J. 1995. The Radical Right in Western Europe. A Comparative Analysis. Michigan: Michigan University Press. 21. Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2014. ‘The Populist Challenge.’ West European Politics 37, no. 2, 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.887879 22. Kriesi, Hanspeter. 1995. ‘Bewegungen auf der Linken, Bewegungen auf der Rechten: Die Mobilisierung von zwei neuen Typen von sozialen Bewegungen in ihrem politischen Kontext.’ Swiss Political Science Review 1, no. 1, 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.1995.tb00002.x 23. Loxbo, Karl. 2010. ‘The Impact of the Radical Right: Lessons from the Local Level in Sweden 2002–2006. Scandinavian Political Studies 33, no. 3, 295–315. 24. Meguid, Bonnie M. 2005. ‘Competition between unequals: The role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success.’ American Political Science Review 99, no. 3, 347–359. Minkenberg, Michael. 2001. ‘The radical right in public office: Agenda‐setting and policy effects.’ West European Politics 24, no. 4, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051701 25. Minkenberg, Michael. 1998. Die neue radikale Rechte im Vergleich: USA, Frankreich, Deutschland. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. 26. Mudde, Cas. 2014. ‘The far right in the 2014 European elections: Of earthquakes, cartels and designer fascists.’ The Washington Post. 30th May 2014 (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/05/30/the-far-right-in-the-2014-european-elections-of-earthquakes-cartels-and-designer-fascists/). Mudde, Cas. 2013. ‘Three decades of populist radical right parties in Western Europe: So what?’ European Journal of Political Research 52, no. 1, 1–19. 27. Mudde, Cas. 2007. Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 28. Murphy, Justin and Devine, Daniel John. 2016. ‘Does Media Coverage Drive Public Support for UKIP or Does Public Support for UKIP Drive Media Coverage?’ Figshare (https://figshare.com/articles/Does_Public_Support_for_UKIP_Drive_Media_Coverage_or_Does_Media_Coverage_Drive_Support_for_UKIP_/1375544). 29. Petrocik, John R. 1996. ‘Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study.’ American Journal of Political Science 40, no. 3, 825–850. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111797 30. Przeworski, Adam and Teune, Henry. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience. 31. Riker, William H. 1993. Agenda Formation. Michigan: Michigan University Press. 32. Rohrschneider, Robert. 2002. ‘Mobilizing versus chasing: How do parties target voters in election campaigns?’ Electoral Studies 21, no. 3, 367–382. Schumacher, Gijs and Van Kersbergen, Kees. 2016. ‘Do mainstream parties adapt to the welfare chauvinism of populist parties?’ Party Politics 22, no. 3, 300–312. 33. Seawright, Jason and Gerring, John. 2008. ‘Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options.’ Political Research Quarterly 61, no. 2, 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077 34. Seeberg, Henrik Bech. 2017. ‘How Stable Is Political Parties’ Issue Ownership? A Cross-Time, Cross-National Analysis.’ Political Studies 65, no. 2, 475–492. 35. Shapiro, Robert Y. 2011. ‘Public Opinion and American Democracy.’ Public Opinion Quarterly 75, no. 5, 982–1017. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr053 36. Taggart, Paul. 2000. Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press. 37. Taggart, Paul. 1995. ‘New populist parties in Western Europe.’ West European Politics 18, no. 1, 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389508425056 38. Tresch, Anke and Lefevere, Jonas and Walgrave, Stefaan. 2018. ‘How parties’ issue emphasis strategies vary across communication channels: The 2009 regional election campaign in Belgium.’ Acta Politica 53, no. 1, 25–47. 39. UK Political Info. 2015. 2015 General election results summary (http://www.ukpolitical.info/2015.htm). 40. UK Political Info. 2010. 2010 General election results summary (http://www.ukpolitical.info/2010.htm). Van der Brug, Wouter and Fennema, Meindert and Tillie, Jean. 2005. ‘Why Some Anti-Immigrant Parties Fail and Others Succeed: A Two-Step Model of Aggregate Electoral Support.’ Comparative Political Studies 38, no. 5, 537–573. Van Spanje, Joost. 2010. ‘Contagious Parties: Anti-Immigration Parties and Their Impact on Other Parties' Immigration Stances in Contemporary Western Europe.’ Party Politics 16, no. 5, 563–586. Van Spanje, Joost and Van der Brug, Wouter. 2009. ‘Being intolerant of the intolerant. The exclusion of Western European anti-immigration parties and its consequences for party choice.’ Acta Politica 44, no. 4, 353–384. 41. Walgrave, Stefaan. and De Swert, Knut. 2004. ‘The Making of the (Issues of the) Vlaams Blok.’ Political Communication 21, no. 4, 479–500. 42. Walgrave, Stefaan and Tresch, Anke and Lefevere, Jonas. 2015. ‘The Conceptualisation and Measurement of Issue Ownership.’ West European Politics 38, no. 4, 778–796. Walgrave, Stefaan and Van Aelst, Peter. 2006. ‘The Contingency of the Mass Media's Political Agenda Setting Power: Toward a Preliminary Theory.’ Journal of Communication 56, no. 1, 88–109. Walker, Jack L. 1977. ‘Setting the Agenda in the U.S. Senate: A Theory of Problem Selection.’ British Journal of Political Science 7, no. 4, 423–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1039381 43. Whiteley, Paul F. and Sanders, David. 2014. British Election Study, 2010: Face-to-Face Survey. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive, August 2014 (http://www.britishelectionstudy.com/data-object/2010-bes-cross-section/). 44. Zimmermann, Ekkart. 2003. ‘Right-wing extremism and xenophobia in Germany: escalation, exaggeration, or what?’ In: Right-Wing Extremism in the Twenty-First Century. Eds. Peter H. Merkl and Leonard Weinberg. London: Frank Cass, 220–250.