1. Abal Medina, Juan and Suárez Cao, Julieta. 2003. “Análisis crítico del sistema electoral argentino. Ev- olución histórica y desempeño efectivo.” Revista de Ciencias Sociales 14, 121–150. Acuña, Carlos. 1995. La Nueva Matriz Política Argentina. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  2. Adrogué, Gerardo. 1995. “El nuevo sistema de partidos en la Argentina.” In: La Nueva Matriz Política Argentina. Ed. Carlos Acuña. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  3. Alonso García, María Elisa. 2007. “La organización interna de los partidos provinciales argentinos: una oligarquía provincial.” Nuevo Mundo Mundos Nuevos. 15th May 2007 (http://nuevomundo.revues.org/ 4545#tocto1n4).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  4. Alonso García, María Elisa. 2008. “Los partidos provinciales y el gobierno dividido en Argentina.” Política y Cultura 29, 245–264.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  5. Altavilla, Cristian. 2011. Federalismo y Sistema de Partidos en Argentina. Determinantes institucionales en la distribución del poder político. Saarbrücken: EAE.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  6. Ardanaz, Martín and Leiras, Marcelo and Tommasi, Mariano. 2010. “The Politics of Federalism in Argentina and its Effects on Governance and Accountability.” Manuscript (http://faculty.udesa.edu.ar/ tommasi/papers/wp/Ardanaz%20Leiras%20Tommasi.pdf).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  7. Bednar, Jenna. 2009. The Robust Federation. Principles of Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  8. Bochsler, Daniel. 2011. “Contestation in Multi-Level Party Systems with Institutional Constraints: A Look at Ethnically Divided Countries in Central and Eastern Europe.” 16th Annual ASN World Convention, 14. – 16. April 2011. New York, USA.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  9. Buchanan, William. 1965. “Politics and Federalism: Party or Anti-Party?” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 359, no. 1, 107–115.
    DOI: 10.1177/000271626535900112
  10. Calvo Ernesto and Abal Medina and Juan Manuel, eds. 2001. El Federalismo Electoral Argentino. Sobrerrepresentación, reforma política y gobierno dividido en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: INAP – Eudeba.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  11. Calvo, Ernesto and Escolar, Marcelo. 2005. La Nueva Política de Partidos en Argentina: crisis política, realineamientos partidarios y reforma electoral. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  12. Calvo, Ernesto and Szwarcherg, Mariela and Micozzi, Juan Pablo and Labanca, Juan Facundo. 2000. “Las fuentes institucionales del gobierno dividido en la Argentina: sesgo mayoritario, sesgo partid- ario y competencia electoral en las legislaturas provinciales argentinas.” In: La Nueva Política de Partidos en Argentina: crisis política, realineamientos partidarios y reforma electoral. Eds. Ernesto Calvo and Marcelo Escolar. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  13. Cámara Nacional Electoral. 2010. Political Parties National Affiliate Registration (Registro Nacional de Afiliados a los Partidos Políticos), 2010 Statistics (http://www.electoral.gob.ar/).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  14. Caramani, Daniele. 2004. The Nationalization of Politics: The Formation of National Electorates and Party Systems in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  15. Carrizo, Carla. 2011. “La política al interior de los partidos: Peronismo, Radicalismo y Kirchnerismo.” In: La política en tiempos de los Kirchner. Eds. Andrés Malamud and Miguel De Luca. Buenos Aires: Eudeba, 85–94.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  16. Chhibber, Pradeep and Kollman, Ken. 2004. The Formation of National Party Systems. Federalism and Party System Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India and the United States. Princeton: Princ- eton University Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  17. Coppedge, Michael. 1997. “The Dynamic Diversity of Latin American Party System.” Meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, 17. – 19. April 1997. Guadalajara, Mexico.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  18. Decree-Law No. 22.838. 1983. “Electoral Law. Electoral System to be applied for presidential and depu- ties’ election.” Official Bulletin of the Argentine Republic N° 25.202, 28th June, 1983.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  19. Decree-Law No. 22.847. 1983. “Call of election for October 30th.” Official Bulletin of the Argentine Republic N° 25.214, 14th July, 1983.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  20. Decree-Law No. 15.264. 1960. “Chamber of Deputies The people of each province shall be represented by at least two members.” Official Bulletin of the Argentine Republic N° 19.130, 9th January, 1960. Decree-Law No. 19.862. 1972. “National Electoral Code.” Official Bulletin of the Argentine Republic N° 22.520, 5th October, 1972.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  21. De Luca, Miguel and Jones, Mark P. and Tula, María Inés. 2002. “Back Rooms or Ballot Boxes? Candidate Nomination in Argentina.” Comparative Political Studies 35, no. 4, 413–436.
    DOI: 10.1177/0010414002035004002
  22. Escolar, Marcelo and Calvo, Ernesto and Calcagno, Natalia and Minvielle, Sandra. 2002. “Últimas imágenes antes del naufragio: las elecciones del 2001 en la Argentina.” Desarrollo Económico 42, no. 165, 25–44.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  23. Gervasoni, Carlos. 2010a. “A Rentier Theory of Subnational Regimes. Fiscal Federalism, Democracy and Authoritarianism in the Argentine Provinces.” World Politics 62, no. 2, 302–340.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  24. Gervasoni, Carlos. 2010b. “Measuring Variance in Subnational Regimes: Results from an Expert-Based: Operationalization of Democracy in the Argentine Provinces.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 2, no. 2, 13–52.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  25. Gibson, Edward and Ernesto Calvo. 2001. “Federalismo y sobrerrepresentación: La dimensión territorial de la reforma económica en la Argentina.” In: El federalismo electoral argentino. Sobrerrepresent- ación, reforma política y gobierno dividido en Argentina. Eds. Ernesto Calvo and Juan Manuel Abal Medina. Buenos Aires: EUDEBA-INAP.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  26. Gibson, Edward and Suárez Cao, Julieta. 2010. “Federalized Party Systems and Subnational Party Com- petition: Theory and an Empirical Application to Argentina.” Comparative Politics 43, no. 1, 21–39. Grodzins, Morton. 1960. “American Political Parties and the American System.” The Western Political Quarterly 13, no. 4, 974–998.
    DOI: 10.5129/001041510X12911363510312
  27. Hepburn, Eve and Detterbeck, Klaus. 2009. “The ‘Territorialization’ of Party Politics in Multi-Level Systems.” International Political Science Association (IPSA) World Congress of Political Science, 12. – 16. July. Santiago,Chille.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  28. Hopkin, Jonathan and Barberà, Oscar. 2011. “Regionalist Parties and Multi-Layered Systems: The UK and Spain in Comparative Perspective.” IPSA-ECPR Joint Conference, 16. – 19. February 2011. São Paulo, Brazil.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  29. Hopkin, Jonathan. 2003. “Political Decentralization, Electoral Change and Party Organizational Adaptation: A Framework for Analysis.” European Urban and Regional Studies 10, no. 3, 227–237. INDEC (National Institute of Statistics and Censuses). 2010. National Census of Population and Housing (http://www.censo2010.indec.gov.ar/).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  30. Jones, Mark and Hwang, Wonjae. 2005. “Provincial Party Boses: Keystone of the Argentine Congress.” In: Argentine Democracy: The Politics of Institutional Weakness. Eds. Steven Levistky and María Victoria Murillo. Pensylvania: Pensylvania State University Press, 115–138.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  31. Jones, Mark and Mainwaring, Scott. 2003. “The Nationalization of Parties and Party Systems: An Em- pirical Measure and an Application to the Americas.” Working paper 304, The Kellogg Institute for International Studies (https://www3.nd.edu/~kellogg/publications/workingpapers/WPS/304.pdf). Jones, Mark and Saiegh, Sebastian and Spiller, Pablo and Tommasi, Mariano. 2002. “Amateur Legisla- tors – Professional Politicians: The Consequences of Party-Centered Electoral Rules in a Federal System.” American Journal of Political Science 46, no. 3, 656–669.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  32. Jones, Mark. 1998. “Explaining the High Level of Party Discipline in the Argentine Congress.” Working Paper 14, CEDI – Universidad de San Andrés (http://faculty.udesa.edu.ar/tommasi/cedi/dts/dt14.pdf). Kikuchi, Hirokazu. 2012. Federalism and the Limits of Presidential Powers: The Case of The Argentine Senate. PhD thesis. University of Pittsburgh.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  33. Laakso, Markku, and Taagepera, Rein. 1979. “Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12, no. 1, 3–27.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  34. Leiras, Marcelo. 2005. Todos los caballos del rey: la integración de los partidos y el gobierno democrático de la Argentina, 1995–2003. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  35. Law No. 23.298. 1985. “Organic Law on Political Parties.” Official Bulletin of the Argentine Republic N° 25.791, 25th October, 1985. ARTICLES 233 Leiras, Marcelo. 2010. “Los procesos de descentralización y la nacionalización de los sistemas de par- tidos en América Latina.” Política y Gobierno 17, no. 2, 205–241.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  36. Levistky, Steven and Murillo, María Victoria, eds. 2005. Argentine Democracy: The Politics of Institu- tional Weakness. Pensylvania: Pensylvania State University Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  37. Levitsky, Steven. 2001. “An ‘Organised Disorganisation’: Informal Organisation and the Persistence of Local Party Structures in Argentine Peronism.” Journal of Latin American Studies 33, no. 1, 29–65. Malamud, Andrés and De Luca, Miguel, eds. 2012. La Política en Tiempos de los Kirchner. Buenos Aires: Audeba.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  38. Malamud, Andrés and Miguel De Luca. 2005. “The Anchors of Continuity: Party-System Stability in Argentina, 1983–2003.” VII Congreso Nacional de Ciencia Política de la SAAP (Sociedad Argentina de Ciencia Política), 15. – 18. November 2005. Córdoba, Spain.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  39. Malamud, Andrés. 2008. “¿Por qué los partidos argentinos sobreviven a sus catástrofes?” Instituto de Iberoamérica (http://americo.usal.es/oir/opal/textos/Andres_Malamud.pdf).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  40. Malamud, Andrés. 2012. “Ni mucho gobierno de la opinión ni tanto regreso de la voluntad: Bipartidismo recargado.” In: La Política en Tiempos de los Kirchner. Eds. Andrés Malamud and Miguel De Luca. Buenos Aires: Audeba, 105–114.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  41. Molinelli, Guillermo and Palanza, Valeria and Sin, Gisela. 1999. Congreso, Presidencia y Justicia en Argentina. Buenos Aires: Temas Grupo Editorial.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  42. Moon, David S. and Bratberg, Øivind. 2010. “Conceptualising the Multi-Level Party: Two Complementary Approaches.” Politics 30, no. 1, 52–60.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  43. National Constitution. 1853. Original text.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  44. National Constitution. 1994. Reformed text.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  45. North, Douglass. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  46. Olmeda, Juan C. and Suárez Cao, Julieta. 2007. “The Federal Connection: Organizational Strategies and the Development of Conservative Parties in Mexico and Argentina.” Midwest Political Science Association Annual Conference, 12. – 15. April 2007. Chicago, USA.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  47. Rayside, David. 1978. “Federalism and the Party System: Provincial and Federal Liberals in the Province of Quebec.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 11, no. 3, 499–528.
    DOI: 10.1017/S0008423900042220
  48. Reynoso, Diego. 2012. “El reparto de la representación. Antecedentes y distorsiones de la asignación de diputados a las provincias.” Revista PostData 17, no. 1, 153–192.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  49. San Martino de Dromi, María Laura. 1998. Historia Política Argentina (1955–1988), Volume II. Buenos Aires: Astrea.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  50. Sartori, Giovanni. 2005. Parties and Party Systems. A Framework for Analysis. Colchester: ECPR Press. Sawers, Larry. 1996. The Other Argentina. The Interior and National Development. Boulder: Westview Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  51. Schakel, Arjan. 2013. “Nationalisation of multilevel party systems: A conceptual and empirical analysis.” European Journal of Political Research 52, no. 2, 212–236.
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02067.x
  52. Scharpf, Fritz W. 1997. Games Real Actors Play. Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder: Westview Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  53. Taagepera, Rein and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1993. “Predicting the Number of Parties: A Quantitative Model of Duverger’s Mechanical Effect.” The American Political Science Review 87, no. 2, 455–464.
    DOI: 10.2307/2939053
  54. Thorlakson, Lori. 2009. “Patterns of Party Integration, Influence and Autonomy in Seven Federations.” Party Politics 15, no. 2, 157–177.
    DOI: 10.1177/1354068808099979
  55. Tommasi, Mariano. 2002. “Federalism in Argentina and the Reforms of the 1990s.” Working Paper 147, Center for Research on Economic Development and Policy Reform. Stanford: Stanford University. Zelaznik, Javier. 2008. “El sistema de partidos en Argentina a principios del siglo XXI.” Revista Iberoamericana 8, no. 32, 170–176.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>