1. Amorim Neto, Octavio and Strøm, Kaare. 2006. ‘Breaking the Parliamentary Chain of Delegation: Presidents and Non-partisan Cabinet Members in European Democracies.’ British Journal of Politi- cal Science 36, no. 2, 619–643. Amorim Neto, Octavio and Lobo, Marina C. 2008. ‘Portugal’s Semi-Presidentialism (Re)Considered: An Assessment of the President’s Role in the Policy Process, 1976–2006.’ Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 28.–31. August. Chicago, United States of America.
    DOI: 10.1017/S0007123406000330
  2. Ball, Stuart. 1986. ‘The Conservative Party and the Formation of the National Government: August 1931.’ The Historical Journal 29, no. 1, 159–182.
    DOI: 10.1017/S0018246X00018665
  3. Bergman, Torbjörn. 1993. ‘Constitutional Design and Government Formation: The Expected Conse- quences of Negative Parliamentarism.’ Scandinavian Political Studies 16, no. 4, 285–304.
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.1993.tb00042.x
  4. Bergman, Torbjörn. 1999. ‘Trade-Offs in Swedish Constitutional Design: The Monarchy under Chal- lenge.’ In: Policy, Office or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Eds. Wolfgang C. Müller and Kaare Strøm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 237–257.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  5. von Beyme, Klaus. 2000. Parliamentary Democracy: Democratization, Destabilization, Recon- solidation 1789–1999. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  6. Carroll, Royce and Cox, Gary W. 2012. ‘Presidents and their Formateurs.’ Working Paper (rcarroll.web.rice.edu/papers/PRESIDENTS%20and%20their%20formateurs.pdf).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  7. Clark, William A. 1998. ‘Presidential Power and Democratic Stability under the Russian Constitution: A Comparative Analysis.’ Presidential Studies Quarterly 28, no. 3, 620–637.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  8. Dutch News. 2012. ‘Queen no longer involved in forming a coalition government.’ Dutch News. 20th March 2012 (http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2012/03/queen_no_longer_involved_in_ca.php). Duverger, Maurice. 1980. ‘A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government.’ European Journal of Political Research 8, no. 2, 165–187.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  9. Elgie, Robert. 1999. Semi-Presidentialism in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  10. Fortin, Jessica. 2012. ‘Measuring presidential powers: Some pitfalls of aggregate measurement.’ International Political Science Review 34, no. 1, 91–112.
    DOI: 10.1177/0192512111421357
  11. Frye, Timothy. 1997. ‘A politics of institutional choice: Post-communist presidencies.’ Comparative Political Studies 30, no. 5, 523–552.
    DOI: 10.1177/0010414097030005001
  12. Gherghina, Sergiu. 2013. ‘Formal and Informal Powers in a Semi-Presidential Regime: The Case of Romania.’ In: Presidents Above Parties? Presidents in Central and Eastern Europe, Their Formal Competences and Informal Power. Ed. Vít Hloušek. Brno: International Institute of Political Science of Masaryk University, 257–270.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  13. Grimaldi, Selena. 2011. ‘The Role of Italian Presidents: The Subtle Boundary between Accountability and Political Action.’ Bulletin of Italian Politics 3, no. 1, 103–125.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  14. Hloušek, Vít, ed. 2013. Presidents Above Parties? Presidents in Central and Eastern Europe, Their Formal Competences and Informal Power. Brno: International Institute of Political Science of Ma- saryk University.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  15. House of Representatives of the Netherlands. 2012. Rules of Procedure (www.houseofrepresentatives.nl/sites/www.houseofrepresentatives.nl/files/content/rules_of_procedure_1.pdf).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  16. Javůrek, Petr. 2008. ‘Postavení prezidentů v politickém systému Polska, Litvy a Rumunska.’ In: Postavení hlavy státu v parlamentních a poloprezidentských režimech: Česká republika v komparativní perspektivě. Eds. Miroslav Novák and Miloš Brunclík. Prague: Dokořán, 78–118.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  17. Klokočka, Vladimír. 1996. Ústavní systémy evropských států. Prague: Linde.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  18. Krupavičius, Algis. 2013. ‘Lithuania’s President: A Formal and Informal Power.’ In: Presidents Above Parties? Presidents in Central and Eastern Europe, Their Formal Competences and Informal Power.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  19. Ed. Vít Hloušek. Brno: International Institute of Political Science of Masaryk University, 205–232. Kysela, Jan. 2008. ‘Ústavní principy, ústavní konvence a ústavní inženýrství.’ In: Pocta Jánu Gronské-mu. Eds. Karel Klíma and Jiří Jirásek. Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk, 121–136.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  20. Marangoni, Francesco. 2012. ‘Technocrats in Government: The Composition and Legislative Initiatives of the Monti Government Eight Months into its Term of Office.’ Bulletin of Italian politics 4, no. 1, 135–149.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  21. Mattila, Mikko and Raunio, Tapio. 2004. ‘Does winning pay? Electoral success and government formation in 15 West European countries.’ European Journal of Political Research 43, no. 2, 263–285. Metcalf, Lee. 2000. ‘Measuring presidential power.’ Comparative Political Studies 33, no. 5, 660–685. Millard, Frances. 2000. ‘Presidents and democratization in Poland: The roles of Lech Wałesa and Aleksander Kwaśniewski in building a new polity.’ Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 16, no. 3, 39–62.
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00154.x
  22. Morgan-Jones, Edward and Schleiter, Petra. 2004. ‘Governmental change in a president-parliamentary regime: The case of Russia 1994–2003.’ Post-Soviet Affairs 20, no. 2, 123–163.
    DOI: 10.2747/1060-586X.20.2.123
  23. Müller, Wolfgang C. 2006. ‘Austria: Imperfect Parliamentarism, but Fully-Fledged Party Democracy.’ In: Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Eds. Kaare Strøm and Wolfgang C. Müller and Torbjörn Bergman. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 221–253.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  24. Kavanagh, Dennis and Richards, David and Geddes, Andrew. 2005. British Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  25. Kingdom, John. 1991. Government and Politics in Britain. An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press. Kongehuset. 2009. Change of government (http://www.kongehuset.no/c30055/artikkel/vis.html?tid=30067). Kozubík, Jan and Chytilek, Roman. 2013. ‘Formální pravomoci současných evropských monarchů a jejich reálné využití.’ Politologický časopis 20, no. 4, 483–506.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  26. McGregor, James. 1994. ‘The Presidency in East Central Europe.’ Politics 3, no. 2, 23–31.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  27. Mediafax. 2009. ‘Designated prime minister announces his government.’ romaniantimes.at. 9th November 2013 (http://romaniantimes.at/?id=4119-newentry).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  28. Nousiainen, Jaakko. 2000. The Finnish System of Government: From a Mixed Constitution to Parliamentarism. Helsinki: Ministry of Justice.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  29. Paloheimo, Heikki. 2007. ‘Finland: Let the Force Be with the Leader – But Who Is the Leader.’ In: The Presidentialization of Politics. A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Eds. Thomas Poguntke and Paul Webb. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 246–268.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  30. Pastorella, Giulia. 2013. ‘Technocratic governments during the Eurocrisis: nothing new under the sun?’ Theseus PhD Workshop, 21.–22. May 2013. Paris, France.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  31. Perottino, Michel. 2008. ‘Prezident republiky ve Francii.’ In: Postavení hlavy státu v parlamentních a poloprezidentských režimech: Česká republika v komparativní perspektivě. Eds. Miroslav Novák and Miloš Brunclík. Prague: Dokořan, 134–159.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  32. Protsyk, OIeh. 2003. ‘Troubled Semi-Presidentialism: Stability of the Constitutional System and Cabinet in Ukraine.’ Europe-Asia Studies 55, no. 7, 1077–1095.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  33. Protsyk, Oleh. 2005a. ‘Prime Ministers’ Identity in Semi-Presidential Regimes: Constitutional Norms and Cabinet Formation Outcomes.’ European Journal of Political Research 44, no. 5, 721–748.
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00245.x
  34. Protsyk, Oleh. 2005b. ‘Politics of Intraexecutive Conflict in Semipresidential Regimes in Eastern Eu- rope.’ East European Politics and Society 19, no. 2, 135–160.
    DOI: 10.1177/0888325404270672
  35. Redvladsen, David. 2011. The Labour Party in Britain and Norway: Elections and the Pursuit of Power Between the World Wars. London: I. B. Tauris.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  36. Salzman, Marcus. 2009. ‘Romania: Boc government resigns after no-confidence vote.’ World Socialist Web Site. 27th October 2009 (http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2009/10/roma-o27.html).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  37. Sartori, Giovanni. 2001. Srovnávací ústavní inženýrství. Zkoumání struktur, podnětů a výsledků. Prague: Slon.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  38. Schleiter, Petra. 2010. ‘Non-partisan ministers in cabinets: who gets in and what do they stand for? An approach and an application to Russia.’ European Models of Governance. A Comparative Perspec- tive, 18.–20. March 2010. Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  39. Schleiter, Petra and Morgan-Jones, Edward. 2005. ‘Semi-presidential Regimes: Providing Flexibility or Generating Representation and Governance Problems?’ Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 1.–4. September 2005. Washington D.C, United States of America.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  40. Schleiter, Petra and Morgan-Jones, Edward. 2009. ‘Party government in Europe? Parliamentary and semi-presidential democracies compared.’ European Journal of Political Research 48, no. 5, 665–693. Schleiter, Petra and Morgan-Jones, Edward. 2010. ‘Who’s in Charge? Presidents, Assemblies, and the Political Control of Semipresidential Cabinets.’ Comparative Political Studies 43, no. 11, 1415–1441. Sedelius, Thomas and Mashtaler, Olga. 2013. ‘Two decades of semi-presidentialism: issues of intra- executive conflict in Central and Eastern Europe 1991–2011.’ East European Politics 29, no. 2, 109–134.
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.00847.x
  41. Shugart, Matthew, S. and Carey, John M. 1992. Presidents and assemblies: Constitutional design and electoral dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  42. Siaroff, Alan. 2003. ‘Comparative presidencies: The inadequacy of the presidential, semi-presidential and parliamentary distinction.’ European Journal of Political Research 42, no. 3, 287–312.
    DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.00084
  43. Strøm, Kaare and Budge, Ian and Laver, Michael J. 1994. ‘Constraints on Cabinet Formation in Parliamentary Democracies.’ American Journal of Political Science 38, no. 2, 303–335.
    DOI: 10.2307/2111406
  44. Strøm, Kaare. 2000. ‘Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies.’ European Journal of Political Research 37, no. 3, 261–290.
    DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.00513
  45. Strøm, Kaare and Narud, Hanne M. 2003. ‘Norway: Virtual Parliamentarism.’ In: Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Eds. Kaare Strøm and Wolfgang C. Müller and Torbjörn Bergman. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 523–551.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  46. Strøm, Kaare and Müller, Wolfgang C. and Bergman, Torbjörn. 2003. Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  47. Tavits, Margit. 2011. Presidents with Prime Ministers. Do Direct Elections Matter? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  48. Verzichelli, Luca and Cotta, Mauricio. 2000. ‘Italy. From ‚Constrained’ Coalitions to Alternating Governments.’ In: Coalition Governments in Western Europe. Eds. Wolfgang C. Müller and Kaare Strøm. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 432–497.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  49. Wall Street. 2009. ‘Lucian Croitoru rejected in a no-confidence vote. Who’s next?’ Wall Street. 6th November 2009 (http://www.wall-street.ro/articol/English-Version/74701/Lucian-Croitoru-rejected-ina-no-confidence-vote-Who-s-next.html).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  50. de Winter, Lieven. 1995. ‘The Role of Parliament in Government Formation and Resignation.’ In: Parliaments and majority Rule in Western Europe. Ed. Herbert Döring. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 115–151.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>