1. Abedi, Amir and Lundberg, omas C. 2009. ‘Doomed to Failure? UKIP and the Organisational Chal- lenges Facing Right-Wing Populist Anti-Political Establishment Parties.’ Parliamentary A airs 62, no. 1, 72−87. Adams, James and Somer-Topcu, Zeynep. 2009. ‘Policy Adjustment by Parties in Response to Rival Par- ties’ Policy Shi s: Spatial eory and the Dynamics of Party Competition in Twenty-Five Post-War Democracies.’ British Journal of Political Science 39, no. 4, 825−846.
    <nenalezeno> (CrossRef odpověď z cache uložená 2017-11-21 13:53:47)
  2. Aldrich, John H. and Montgomery, Jacob M. and Sparks, David B. 2014. ‘Polarization and Ideology: Partisan Sources of Low Dimensionality in Scaled Roll Call Analyses.’ Political Analysis 22, no. 4, 435−456.
    <nenalezeno> (CrossRef odpověď z cache uložená 2017-11-21 13:53:47)
  3. Ansolabehere, Stephen and Snyder, James M. and Stewart III, Charles. 2001. ‘ e E ects of Party and Preferences on Congressional Roll-Call Voting.’ Legislative Studies Quarterly 26, no. 4, 533−572. Arter, David. 2016. ‘When New Party X Has the ‘X Factor’: On Resilient Entrepreneurial Parties.’ Party Politics 22, no. 1, 15−26.
    <nenalezeno> (CrossRef odpověď z cache uložená 2017-11-21 13:53:47)
  4. Bakker, Ryan and Edwards, Erica and Hooghe, Liesbet and Jolly, Seth and Marks, Gary and Polk, Jonathan and Rovny, Jan and Steenbergen, Marco and Vachudova, Milada. 2015. 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey. Version 2015.1. Available on chesdata.eu. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
    <nenalezeno> (CrossRef odpověď z cache uložená 2017-11-21 13:53:48)
  5. Barberá, Pablo. 2015. ‘Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data.’ Political Analysis 23, no. 1, 76−91.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpu011 (CrossRef odpověď z cache uložená 2017-11-21 13:53:48)
  6. Bíba, Jan. 2013. ‘Populismus a reprezentativní demokracie: k možnosti populismu jako emancipační strategie.’ Politologická revue 19, no. 1, 87−105.
    <nenalezeno> (CrossRef odpověď z cache uložená 2017-11-21 13:53:48)
  7. Bischo , Ivo. 2005. ‘Party Competition in a Heterogeneous Electorate: e Role of Dominant-Issue Vot- ers.’ Public Choice 122, no. 1−2, 221−243.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-5804-2
  8. Bolleyer, Nicole and Bytzek, Evelyn. 2013. ‘Origins of Party Formation and New Party Success in Ad- vanced Democracies.’ European Journal of Political Research 52, no. 6, 773−796.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12013
  9. Bureš, Jan. 2012. ‘Volby 2010 v České republice: fenomén nových stran TOP09 a VV.’ Politics in Central Europe 8, no. 2, 141−151.
    <nenalezeno>
  10. Carroll, Royce and Lewis, Je rey B. and Lo, James and Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard. 2009. ‘Comparing NOMINATE and IDEAL: Points of Di erence and Monte Carlo Tests.’ Legislative Stud- ies Quarterly 34, no. 4, 555−591.
    <nenalezeno>
  11. Carrubba, Cli ord and Gabel, Matthew and Hug, Simon. 2008. ‘Legislative Voting Behavior, Seen and Unseen: A eory of Roll‐Call Vote Selection.’ Legislative Studies Quarterly 33, no. 4, 543−572.
    https://doi.org/10.3162/036298008786403079
  12. Český statistický úřad. 2013. Volby.cz – Volby do Poslanecké sněmovny Parlamentu České republiky konané ve dnech 25.10. – 26.10.2013 (http://www.volby.cz/pls/ps2013/ps).
    <nenalezeno>
  13. Český statistický úřad. 2010. Volby.cz – Volby do Poslanecké sněmovny Parlamentu České republiky konané ve dnech 28. 5. – 29. 5. 2010 (http://www.volby.cz/pls/ps2010/ps).
    <nenalezeno>
  14. Charvát, Jakub. 2015. ‘Etablované strany v obležení: rekonstrukce českého stranického systému od 2010.’ Annales Scientia Politica 4, no. 2, 19−32.
    <nenalezeno>
  15. Clinton, Joshua D. 2012. ‘Using Roll Call Estimates to Test Models of Politics.’ Annual Review of Political Science 15, 79−99.
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-043010-095836
  16. Clinton, Joshua D. and Jackman, Simon. 2009. ‘To Simulate or NOMINATE?’ Legislative Studies Quar- terly 34, no. 4, 593−621.
    https://doi.org/10.3162/036298009789869691
  17. Clinton, Joshua D. and Meirowitz, Adam. 2001. ‘Agenda Constrained Legislator Ideal Points and the Spatial Voting Model.’ Political Analysis 9, no. 3, 242−259.
    <nenalezeno>
  18. Clinton, Joshua and Jackman, Simon and Rivers, Douglas. 2004. ‘ e Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data.’ American Political Science Review 98, no. 2, 355−370.
    <nenalezeno>
  19. CVVM. 2016. Sebeza azen na levopravé škále politické orientace – duben 2016. Centrum pro výzkum veřejného mínění, Sociologický ústav AV ČR (http://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/media/com_form2content/ documents/c1/a7559/f3/po160517.pdf ).
    <nenalezeno>
  20. CVVM. 2017. Stranické preference a volebn model v červnu 2017. Centrum pro výzkum veřejného mínění, Sociologický ústav AV ČR (https://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/media/com_form2content/documents/ c2/a4368/f9/pv170626.pdf ).
    <nenalezeno>
  21. Deegan-Krause, Kevin. 2006. Elected A nities: Democracy and Party Competition in Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    <nenalezeno>
  22. Deegan-Krause, Kevin and Enyedi, Zsolt. 2010. ‘Agency and the Structure of Party Competition: Align- ment, Stability and the Role of Political Elites.’ West European Politics 33, no. 3, 686−710.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01402381003654742
  23. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic eory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
    <nenalezeno>
  24. Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties. London: Methuen.
    <nenalezeno>
  25. Eibl, Otto. 2014. ‘Analýza volebních programů.’ In: Volby do Poslanecké sněmovny 2013. Ed. Vlastimil Havlík. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 23–54.
    <nenalezeno>
  26. Enyedi, Zsolt. 2005. ‘ e Role of Agency in Cleavage Formation.’ European Journal of Political Research 44, no. 5, 697−720.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00244.x
  27. Foy, Henry. 2016. ‘Lunch with the FT: Andrej Babiš.’ .com. 19th February 2016 (http://www. .com/intl/ cms/s/2/83908fd2-d4a5-11e5-829b-8564e7528e54.html).
    <nenalezeno>
  28. Gawrecká, Daniela. 2013. Who Watches the Watchmen? Risk Perception and Security vs. the Privacy Dilemma in the Czech Press. Prague SECONOMICS Discussion Papers 2013/5. Prague: Institute of Sociology, AS CR (http://www.soc.cas.cz/sites/default/ les/soubory/who_watches_the_watchmen. pdf ).
    <nenalezeno>
  29. Gregor, Kamil. 2014. ‘Přesuny hlasů.’ In: Volby do Poslanecké sněmovny 2013. Ed. Vlastimil Havlík. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 189–214.
    <nenalezeno>
  30. Gregor, Miloš and Macková, Alena. 2014. ‘Předvolební kampaně 2013: prohloubení trendů, nebo nástup nových?’ In: Volby do Poslanecké sněmovny 2013. Ed. Vlastimil Havlík. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 55–72.
    <nenalezeno>
  31. Hanley, Seán. 2011. ‘Dynamika utváření nových stran v České republice v letech 1996–2010: hledání možných příčin politického zemětřesení.’ Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 47, no. 1, 115−136.
    <nenalezeno>
  32. Hansen, Martin E. 2008. ‘Reconsidering the Party Distances and Dimensionality of the Danish Folket- ing.’ e Journal of Legislative Studies 14, no. 3, 264−278.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330802259442
  33. Harmel, Robert and Svåsand, Lars. 1993. ‘Party Leadership and Party Institutionalisation: ree Phases of Development.’ West European Politics 16, no. 2, 67−88.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389308424961
  34. Havlík, Vlastimil. 2010. ‘Politické strany a jejich systém v letech 2006–2010.’ In: Volby do Poslanecké sněmovny v roce 2010. Ed. Stanislav Balík. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury, 11–38.
    <nenalezeno>
  35. Havlík, Vlastimil. 2014. ‘Výsledky voleb.’ In: Volby do Poslanecké sněmovny 2013. Ed. Vlastimil Havlík. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 141–60.
    <nenalezeno>
  36. Havlík, Vlastimil and Hloušek, Vít. 2014. ‘Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde: e Story of the Populist Public A airs Party in the Czech Republic.’ Perspectives on European Politics and Society 15, no. 4, 552−570.
    <nenalezeno>
  37. Hix, Simon and Høyland, Bjørn. 2013. ‘Empowerment of the European Parliament.’ Annual Review of Political Science 16, 171−189.
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032311-110735
  38. Hix, Simon and Noury, Abdul. 2016. ‘Government-Opposition or Le -Right? e Institutional Determi- nants of Voting in Legislatures.’ Political Science Research and Methods 4, no. 2, 249−273.
    <nenalezeno>
  39. Hix, Simon and Noury, Abdul and Roland, Gérard. 2006. ‘Dimensions of Politics in the European Parlia- ment.’ American Journal of Political Science 50, no. 2, 494−520.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00198.x
  40. Hloušek, Vít. 2012. ‘Věci veřejné: politické podnikání strany typu rmy.’ Politologický časopis 19, no. 4, 322–340.
    <nenalezeno>
  41. Hloušek, Vít and Kopeček, Lubomír. 2008. ‘Cleavages in Contemporary Czech and Slovak Politics: Be- tween Persistence and Change.’ East European Politics and Societies 22, no. 3, 518−552.
    <nenalezeno>
  42. Ho , Peter D. 2009. A First Course in Bayesian Statistical Methods. New York: Springer.
    <nenalezeno>
  43. Hopkin, Jonathan and Paolucci, Caterina. 1999. ‘ e Business Firm Model of Party Organisation: Cases from Spain and Italy.’ European Journal of Political Research 35, no. 3, 307−339.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00451
  44. Hotelling, Harold. 1929. ‘Stability in Competition.’ e Economic Journal 39, no. 153, 41-57.
    <nenalezeno>
  45. Hug, Simon. 2001. Altering Party Systems: Strategic Behavior and the Emergence of New Political Parties in Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    <nenalezeno>
  46. Innes, Abby. 2002. ‘Party Competition in Postcommunist Europe: e Great Electoral Lottery.’ Comparative Politics 35, no. 1, 85−104.
    <nenalezeno>
  47. Jackman, Simon. 2015. Pscl: Classes and Methods for R Developed in the Political Science Computational Laboratory, Stanford University. Department of Political Science, Stanford University. Stanford, California. R package version 1.4.9. (http://pscl.stanford.edu/).
    <nenalezeno>
  48. Jackman, Simon. 2001. ‘Multidimensional Analysis of Roll Call Data via Bayesian Simulation: Identi cation, Estimation, Inference, And Model Checking.’ Political Analysis 9, no. 3, 227−241.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/polana/9.3.227
  49. Jarmara, Tomáš. 2011. ‘TOP 09 a Věci veřejné v kontextu institucionalizace českých politických stran po roce 1989.’ Politologická revue 17, no. 1, 56−74.
    <nenalezeno>
  50. Katz, Richard S. and Mair, Peter. 1995. ‘Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy the Emergence of the Cartel Party.’ Party Politics 1, no. 1, 5−28.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068895001001001
  51. Kirchheimer, Otto. 1966. ‘ e Transformation of the Western European Party Systems.’ In: Political parties and political development. Eds. Joseph LaPalombara and Myron Weiner. Princeton: Princetion University Press, 177−200.
    <nenalezeno>
  52. Kopeček, Lubomír. 2015. Deformace demokracie? Opozičn smlouva a česká politika 1998-2002. Brno: Barrister & Principal.
    <nenalezeno>
  53. Kopeček, Lubomír and Svačinová, Petra. 2015. ‘Kdo rozhoduje v českých politických stranách? Vzestup nových politických podnikatelů ve srovnávací perspektivě.’ St edoevropské politické studie 17, no. 2, 178−211.
    <nenalezeno>
  54. Koubek, Jiří. 2010. ‘České sněmovní volby 2010 z hlediska stability a změny stranického systému: blokační aktéři, personalizace, lokalizace a fragmentace.’ Politologická revue 16, no. 1, 111−127. Krouwel, André. 2003. ‘Otto Kirchheimer and the Catch-All Party.’ West European Politics 26, no. 2, 23−40. Krouwel, André. 2006. ‘Party Models.’ In: Handbook of party politics. Eds. Richard S. Katz and William Crotty. London- ousand Oaks-New Delhi: SAGE, 249−269.
    <nenalezeno>
  55. Krouwel, André. 2012. Party Transformations in European Democracies. Albany: State University of New York Press.
    <nenalezeno>
  56. Kupka, Petr and Mochťák, Michal. 2014. ‘Aféra Nagygate mezi korupcí a organizovaným zločinem: korupční sítě a jejich možný vliv na kvalitu demokracie v České republice.’ St edoevropské politické studie 16, no. 4, 237−263.
    <nenalezeno>
  57. Lauderdale, Benjamin E. 2010. ‘Unpredictable Voters in Ideal Point Estimation.’ Political Analysis 18, no. 2, 151−171.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpp038
  58. Laver, Michael. 2014. ‘Measuring Policy Positions in Political Space.’ Annual Review of Political Science 17, no. 207−223.
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-061413-041905
  59. Laver, Michael and Benoit, Kenneth and Garry, John. 2003. ‘Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data.’ American Political Science Review 97, no. 2, 311−331.
    <nenalezeno>
  60. Lee, Daniel J. 2014. ‘ ird-Party reat and the Dimensionality of Major-Party Roll Call Voting.’ Public Choice 159, no. 3-4, 515−531.
    <nenalezeno>
  61. Linek, Lukáš. 2002. ‘Co ne/dělat s teorií kartelové strany?’ Politologická revue 8, no. 2, 117-33.
    <nenalezeno>
  62. Lucardie, Paul. 2000. ‘Prophets, Puri ers and Prolocutors Towards a eory on the Emergence of New Parties.’ Party Politics 6, no. 2, 175−185.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068800006002003
  63. Lyons, Pat and Lacina, Tomáš. 2009. ‘An Examination of Legislative Roll-Call Voting in the Czech Republic Using Spatial Models.’ Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 45, no. 6, 1155−1190. Mair, Peter. 1999. ‘New Political Parties in Established Party Systems: How Successful Are ey?’ In: Elites, parties and democracy: festschri for professor Mogens N. Pedersen. Eds. Erik Beukel and Kurt K. Klausen and Poul E. Mouritzen. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark, 207−224. McCarty, Nolan and Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard. 2001. ‘ e Hunt for Party Discipline in Congress.’ American Political Science Review 95, no. 3, 673−687.
    <nenalezeno>
  64. Meyer‐Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2008. ‘ e Changing Colours of the Post‐Communist State: e Politicisation of the Senior Civil Service in Hungary.’ European Journal of Political Research 47, no. 1, 1−33. Naxera, Vladimír. 2014. ‘Stranická patronáž a její vztah ke korupci a klientelismu: teoretický koncept a nástin uplatnění v postkomunistickém prostředí.’ St edoevropské politické studie 16, no. 4, 264-87. Olson, Mancur. 1965. e Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge-London: Harvard University Press. Ondráčka, David and Vymětal, Petr. 2015. ‘Transparentní nancování kampaní? Předvolební kampaň do Poslanecké sněmovny 2013.’ Politologická revue 21, no. 2, 95−124.
    <nenalezeno>
  65. Panebianco, Angelo. 1988. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    <nenalezeno>
  66. Parlament České republiky, Kancelář Poslanecké sněmovny. 2017. Data Poslanecké sněmovny a Senátu (https://www.psp.cz/sqw/hp.sqw?k=1300).
    <nenalezeno>
  67. Pecháček, Štěpán. 2013. ‘Personalizace politiky v České republice.’ Politologická revue 19, no. 2, 93−109. Pedahzur, Ami and Brichta, Avraham. 2002. ‘ e Institutionalization of Extreme Right-Wing Charismatic Parties: A Paradox?’ Party Politics 8, no. 1, 31−49.
    <nenalezeno>
  68. Perottino, Michel. 2015. ‘Expertíza v českých politických stranách: poznámky k teoretickému a praktickému rámci.’ Acta Politologica 7, no. 2, 119−132.
    <nenalezeno>
  69. Polášek, Martin and Perottino, Michel and Novotný, Vilém. 2014. ‘Expertiza v politických stranách: téma a jeho teoretické uchopení.’ Politologická revue 11, no. 1, 147−166.
    <nenalezeno>
  70. Poole, Keith T. 2005. Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Poole, Keith T. 2000. ‘Nonparametric Unfolding of Binary Choice Data.’ Political Analysis 8, no. 3, 211−237. Poole, Keith T. and Lewis, Je rey and Lo, James and Carroll, Royce. 2011. ‘Scaling Roll Call Votes with wnominate in R.’ Journal of Statistical So ware 42, no. 14, 1−21.
    <nenalezeno>
  71. Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard. 2001. ‘D-Nominate A er 10 Years: A Comparative Update to Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll-Call Voting.’ Legislative Studies Quarterly 26, no. 1, 5−29. Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard. 1991. ‘Patterns of Congressional Voting.’ American Journal of Political Science 35, no. 1, 228−278.
    https://doi.org/10.2307/440401
  72. Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard. 1985. ‘A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis.’ American Journal of Political Science 29, no. 2, 357−384.
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2111172
  73. Riker, William H. 1962. e eory of Political Coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press. Robertson, David Bruce. 1976. A eory of Party Competition. New York: John Wiley.
    <nenalezeno>
  74. Rosenthal, Howard and Voeten, Erik. 2004. ‘Analyzing Roll Calls with Perfect Spatial Voting: France 1946–1958.’ American Journal of Political Science 48, no. 3, 620−632.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00091.x
  75. Rovny, Jan. 2013. ‘Where do radical right parties stand? Position blurring in multidimensional competition.’ European Political Science Review 5, no. 1, 1−26.
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773911000282
  76. Sartori, Giovanni. 2005. ‘Party Types, Organisation and Functions.’ West European Politics 28, no. 1, 5−32. Schmitt, Hermann and Hobolt, Sara B. and Popa, Sebastian A. and Teperoglou, E ichia and European Parliament, Directorate-General for Communication, Public Monitoring Unit. 2015. European Par- liament Election Study 2014, Voter Study, First Post-Election Survey. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5160 Data le Version 3.0.0. Sieberer, Ulrich. 2006. ‘Party Unity in Parliamentary Democracies: A Comparative Analysis.’ e Journal of Legislative Studies 12, no. 2, 150−178.
    <nenalezeno>
  77. Smithies, Arthur. 1941. ‘Optimum Location in Spatial Competition.’ e Journal of Political Economy 49, no. 3, 423−439.
    https://doi.org/10.1086/255724
  78. Snyder, James M. and Groseclose, Tim. 2001. ‘Estimating Party In uence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting.’ American Political Science Review 95, no. 3, 689−698.
    <nenalezeno>
  79. Stauber, Jakub. 2015. ‘Organizační vývoj nových politických stran v České republice pohledem teorie institucionalizace.’ Acta Politologica 7, no. 2, 133−155.
    <nenalezeno>
  80. Štětka, Václav and Vochocová, Lenka. 2014. ‘A Dialogue of the Deaf, or Communities of Debate? e Use of Facebook in the 2013 Czech Parliamentary Elections Campaign.’ Teorija in Praksa 51, no. 6, 1361−1380.
    <nenalezeno>
  81. Stokes, Donald E. 1963. ‘Spatial Models of Party Competition.’ American Political Science Review 57, no. 2, 368−377.
    <nenalezeno>
  82. Strøm, Kaare. 1990. ‘A Behavioral eory of Competitive Political Parties.’ American Journal of Political Science 34, no. 2, 565−598.
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2111461
  83. Syllová, Jindřiška and Kolář, Petr and Kysela, Jan and Georgiev, Jiří and Pecháček, Štěpán. 2008. Parla- ment České republiky. Praha: Linde.
    <nenalezeno>
  84. TNS Aisa. 2017. Trendy Česka ‘17. Červen 2017. TNS Aisa (http://www.ceskatelevize.cz/ct24/sites/de- fault/ les/1941169-trendy_ceska_2017_vlna_35_cerven_volebni_model.pdf ).
    <nenalezeno>
  85. Vandoren, Peter M. 1990. ‘Can We Learn the Causes of Congressional Decisions from Roll-Call Data?’ Legislative Studies Quarterly 15, no. 3, 311−340.
    https://doi.org/10.2307/439766
  86. Vodička, Karel and Cabada, Ladislav. 2011. Politický systém České republiky: historie a současnost. Praha: Portál.
    <nenalezeno>
  87. Volkens, Andrea and Lehmann, Pola and Matthiefl, eres and Merz, Nicolas and Regel, Sven and Wer- ner, Annika. 2015. e Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2015a. Berlin: Wissenscha szentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).
    <nenalezeno>
  88. Weßels, Bernhard. 2011. European Parliament Election Study 2009, Candidate Study. GESIS Data Ar- chive, Cologne. ZA5048 Data le Version 2.0.0 Wintr, Jan. 2010. Česká parlamentní kultura. Praha: Auditorium.
    <nenalezeno>