1. ADEPT [Association for Participatory Democracy]. 2010. ‘Republican constitutional referendum of Sep- tember 5, 2010.’ e-democracy (http://www.e-democracy.md/en/elections/referendum/2010/). Andrews, Wiliam G. 1982. Presidential Government in Gaullist France: A Study of Executive-Legislative Relations. New York: State University of New York Press.
   DOI: <nenalezeno>
2. BBC News. 2010. ‘Kenya leaders Kibaki and Odinga try to heal ri .’ BBC News. 23th February (http:// news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8530113.stm).
   DOI: <nenalezeno>
3. Bedock, Camille. 2014. ‘Explaining the determinants and processes of institutional change.’ French Poli- tics 12, no. 4, 357–374.
   DOI: <nenalezeno>
4. Bedock, Camille. 2015. ‘Short-term matters: the determinants of reforms of the core democratic rules.’ First View Article. European Political Science Review, November 2015, 1–21 (http://journals.cam- bridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=9499009& leId=S1755773914000411).
   DOI: <nenalezeno>
5. Bedock, Camille and Mair, Peter and Wilson, Alex. 2012. ‘Institutional Change in Advanced European Democracies: an Exploratory Assessment.’ EUI Working Paper, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (http://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/20817).
   DOI: <nenalezeno>
6. Bethell, Leslie. 2008. ‘Politics in Brazil under the Liberal Republic, 1945–1964.’ In: e Cambridge Hsitory of Latin America, Volume IX, Brazil since 1930. Ed. Leslie Bethell. New York: Cambridge University Press, 87–163.
   DOI: <nenalezeno>
7. Von Beyme, Klaus. 2001. ‘Institutional engineering and transition to democracy.’ In: Democratic Con- solidation in Eastern Europe Volume 1: Institutional Engineering. Ed. Jan Zielonka. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–24.
   DOI: <nenalezeno>
8. Center for Systemic Peace. 2012. Polity IV Project, Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2012 (http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm).
   DOI: <nenalezeno>
9. Cheibub, Jose A. and Elkins, Zachary and Ginsburg, Tom. 2011. ‘Latin American presidentialism in comparative and historical perspective.’ Texas Law Review 89, no. 7, 1707–1739.
   DOI: <nenalezeno>
10. Cheibub, Jose A. and Elkins, Zachary and Ginsburg, Tom. 2014. ‘Beyond presidentialism and parliamen- tarism.’ British Journal of Political Science 44, no. 3, 515–544.
    DOI: 10.1017/S000712341300032X
11. Cheibub, Jose A. and Gandhi, Jennifer and Vreeland, James R. 2010. ‘Democracy and dictatorship revis- ited.’ Public Choice 143, no. 1–2, 67–101.
    DOI: 10.1007/s11127-009-9491-2
12. Colombo Telegraph. 2013. ‘Full text: proposals for constitutional reform.’ Colombo Telegraph. 6th April (https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/full-text-proposals-for-constitutional-reform/). Crowther, William. 2011. ‘Semi-presidentialism and Moldova’s awed transition to democracy.’ In: Semi-presidentialism and Democracy. Eds. Robert Elgie and Sophia Moestrup and Yu-Shan Wu. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 210–228.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
13. Çarkoğlu, Ali. 2011. ‘Turkey’s 2011 general elections: towards a dominant party system?’ Insight Turkey 13, no. 3, 43–62.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
14. Dassonneville, Ruth. 2015. Net Volatility in Western Europe: 1950–2014. Dataset. KU Leuven: Centre for Citizenship and Democracy (http://soc.kuleuven.be/web/staticpage/11/95/eng/1197). Deegan-Krause, Kevin. 2010. Czech election update: time for the bigger picture. Pozorblog Politics in Eu- rope and Beyond. 1st June 2010 (http://www.pozorblog.com/blog/2010/06/czech-election-updatetime-for-the-bigger-picture/).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
15. Doyle, David and Elgie, Robert. 2014. ‘Maximizing the reliability of cross-national measures of presidential power.’ First View Article. British Journal of Political Science, November 2015, 1–11 (http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=9489492&fileId= S0007123414000465).
    DOI: 10.1017/S0007123414000465
16. Duverger, Maurice. 1980. ‘A new political system model: semi-presidential government.’ European Jour- nal of Political Research 8, no. 2, 165–187.
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00569.x
17. Elgie, Robert. 1999. ‘France.’ In: Semi-Presidentialism in Europe. Ed. Robert Elgie. New York: Oxford University Press, 82–100.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
18. Elgie, Robert. 1999. ‘ e politics of semi-presidentialism.’ In: Semi-Presidentialism in Europe. Ed. Robert Elgie. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–21.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
19. Elgie, Robert. 2011. Semi-Presidentialism: Sub-Types and Democratic Performance. Oxford: Oxford Uni- versity Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
20. Elgie, Robert and Moestrup, Sophia. 2007. Semi-Presidentialism Outside Europe. New York: Routledge. Elkins, Zachary. 2013. ‘ e weight of history and the rebuilding of Brazilian democracy.’ Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política 88, 257–303.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
21. Femando, Laksiri. 2013. ‘NMSJ and constitutional reform proposals.’ Colombo Telegraph. 10th April 2013 (https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/nmsj-and-constitutional-reform-proposals/). Ginsburg, Tom and Simpser, Alberto. 2013. Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes. New York: Cambrisge University Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
22. Gonsalkorale, Raj. 2013. ‘UNP divorces its 1978 constitution; Sri Lanka set for reconciliation through constitutional reform.’ Asian Tribune. 5th June 2013 (http://www.asiantribune.com/node/62763). Groundviews. 2010. ‘A timeline of duplicity: promises to abolish the executive presidency.’ Groundviews. 5th September 2010 (http://groundviews.org/2010/09/05/a-timeline-of-duplicity-promises-to-abolish-the-executive-presidency/).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
23. Güven, Erdal. 2013. AK Parti’nin başkanlık sistemi tekli (tam metin) [AKP’s proposal for a presidential system (full text)]. Erdal Güven’s Blog. 1st April 2013 (http://erdalguven.wordpress.com/2013/04/01/ ak-partinin-baskanlik-sistemi-tekli -tam-metin/).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
24. Hartlyn, Jonathan. 2010. ‘Constitutional structure in Latin America.’ Texas Law Review 89, 1977–1983.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
25. Hayo, Berndt and Voigt, Stefan. 2010. ‘Determinants of constitutional change: why do governments change their form of government?’ Journal of Comparative Economics 38, no. 3, 283–305.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jce.2010.07.007
26. Henderson, Karen. 2002. Slovakia: the Escape from Invisibility. London: Routledge.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
27. Kopeček, Lubomír and Mlejnek, Josef. 2013. ‘Di erent confessions, same sins? Václav Havel and Václav Klaus as Czech Presidents.’ In: Presidents Above Parties? Presidents in Central and Eastern Europe, eir Formal Competencies and Informal Power. Ed. Vít Hloušek. Brno: Masaryk University Press, 31–75.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
28. Kramon, Eric and Posner, Daniel N. 2011. ‘Kenya’s new constitution.’ Journal of Democracy 22, no. 2, 89–103. Kysela, Jan. 2013. ‘Nekonečný příběh. Přímá volba prezidenta České republiky.’ New Presence: e Prague Journal of Central European A airs 3, 3–8.
    DOI: 10.1353/jod.2011.0026
29. KRI Kusaka Research Institute. 2009. Parliament election 1977 (http://www.jpp.co.jp/lanka/gov/govd/ govde/gov38e.htm).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
30. Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in irty-Six Democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
31. Liyanage, Sumanasiri. 2010. ‘Constitutional reforms in Sri Lanka: what was asked for, what was promised and what is going to be o ered.’ Groundviews. 27th June 2010 (http://groundviews.org/2010/06/27/ constitutional-reforms-in-sri-lanka-what-was-asked-for-what-was-promised-and-what-is-going- to-be-o ered/).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
32. Malová, Darina and Láštic, Erik. 2001. ‘ e gradual amending of the Slovak constitution: combating the ambiguous rules in 1992–2001.’ Central European Political Science Review 2, no. 4, 103–128.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
33. Metcalf, Lee K. 2000. ‘Measuring presidential power.’ Comparative Political Studies 33, no. 5, 660–685. Özbudun, Ergun and Gençkaya, Ömer. F. 2009. Democratization and the Politics of Constitution Making in Turkey. Budapest and New York: Central European University Press.
    DOI: 10.1177/0010414000033005004
34. Özsoy, Şule. 2009. Başkanlı Parlamenter Sistem [Parliamentary Systems with President]. Istanbul: Oniki Levha Yayıncılık.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
35. Pedersen, Mogens N. 1979. ‘ e dynamics of European party systems: changing patterns of electoral volatility.’ European Journal of Political Research 7, no. 1, 1–26.
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1979.tb01267.x
36. Powell, Eleanor N. and Tucker, Joshua A. 2014. ‘Revisiting electoral volatility in post-communist countries: new data, new results and new approaches.’ British Journal of Political Science 44, no. 1, 123–147. Protsyk, Oleh. 2011. ‘Semi-presidentialism under post-communism.’ In: Semi-Presidentialism and Democracy. Eds. Robert Elgie and Sophia Moestrup and Yu-Shan Wu. New York: Palgrave, 98–116. Przeworski, Adam and Alvarez, Michael E. and Cheibub, José A. and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. De- mocracy and Devlopment: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    DOI: 10.1017/S0007123412000531
37. Ranjith, H. and Somarathna, A. 2013. ‘Sri Lanka’s executive presidency: a critical analysis of its powers and functions under the constitutions of 1978 and subsequent constitutional amendments.’ Social Sciences and Humanities Review 1, no. 1, 75–96.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
38. Ratyanake, K. 2000. ‘Sri Lankan government crisis deepens as Kumaratunga ‘postpones’ constitutional reform bill.’ World Socialist Web Site. 9th August 2000 (http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2000/08/ slpk-a09.html).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
39. Resnick, Danielle. 2011. ‘Are electoral coalitions harmful for democratic consolidation in Africa?’ Working paper 2011/07. UNU-WIDER (http://www.wider.unu.edu/publications/working-papers/2011/ en_GB/wp2011-007/).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
40. Roper, Steven D. 2008. ‘From semi-presidentialism to parliamentarism: regime change and presidential power in Moldova.’ Europe-Asia Studies 60, no. 1, 113–126.
    DOI: 10.1080/09668130701760364
41. Şafak, Erdal. 2014. ‘Yeni dönemin işaretleri... [Signs of the new era...].’ Sabah. 8th April 2014 (http://www. sabah.com.tr/gundem/2014/04/08/yeni-donemin-isaretleri).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
42. Sartori, Giovanni. 1997. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: an Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. London: Macmillan.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
43. Shugart, Matthew. S. 1993. ‘Of presidents and parliaments.’ East European Constiutional Review 2, no. 1, 30–32.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
44. Shugart, Matthew S. 2005. ‘Semi-presidential systems: dual executive and mixed authority patterns.’ French Politics 3, no. 3, 323–351.
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.fp.8200087
45. Shugart, Matthew S. and Carey, John M. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Elec- toral Dynamics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
46. Siaro , Alan. 2003. ‘Comparative presidencies: the inadequacy of the presidential, semi‐presidential and parliamentary distinction.’ European Journal of Political Research 42, no. 3, 287–312.
    DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.00084
47. State, Paul F. 2011. A Brief History of France. New York: Facts on File.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
48. e Economist. 2012. ‘Moldova nally gets a president.’ e Ecnoomist. 17th March 2012 (http://www. economist.com/blogs/easternapproaches/2012/03/moldovas-politics).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
49. Tran, Mark. 2008. ‘Kenya’s leaders agree power-sharing deal.’ e Guardian. 28th February 2008 (http:// www.theguardian.com/world/2008/feb/28/kenya).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
50. Ünal, Mustafa. 1996. ‘Rota başkanlık sistemi [Towards a presidential system].’ Aksiyon, 28 December 1996 (http://www.aksiyon.com.tr/mustafa-unal/rota-baskanlik-sistemi_502090).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
51. Velinger, Jan. 2015. ‘Lawmakers to discuss legislation to curb presidential powers.’ Radio Praha. 14th Janu- ary 2015 (http://www.radio.cz/en/section/curra rs/lawmakers-to-discuss-legislation-to-curb-presidential-powers).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
52. Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service. 2006. Political Database of the Americas. Center for Latin American Studies, Georgetown University (http://pdba.georgetown.edu/).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
53. Wilson, A. Jeyaratnam. 1980. e Gaullist System in Asia: e Constitution of Sri Lanka 1978. London: MacMillan.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
54. Yetkin, Murat. 2014. ‘İhsanoğlu ile CHP ve MHP Erdoğan›ın bahçesine girdi [With İhsanoğlu, CHP and MHP are in Erdoğan›s backyard].’ Radikal. 17th June 2014 (http://www.radikal.com.tr/yazarlar/ murat_yetkin/ihsanoglu_ile_chp_ve_mhp_erdoganin_bahcesine_girdi-1197448).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>