1. Akerlof, George A. 1970. ‘ e Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.’ e Quarterly Journal of Economics 84, no. 3, 488–500. Albin, Cecilia. 2012. ‘Improving the E ectiveness of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: A Synopsis.’ Inter- national Negotiation 17, no. 1, 1–8.
   DOI: 10.2307/1879431
2. Consultative Board of the WTO. 2004. e future of the WTO: Addressing institutional challenges in the new millennium. Geneva: World Trade Organization.
   DOI: <nenalezeno>
3. Cottier, omas. 2010. ‘A two-tier approach to WTO decision-making.’ In: Redesigning the World Trade Organization for the twenty- rst century. Ed. Debra P. Steger. Ottawa: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 43–66.
   DOI: <nenalezeno>
4. Crump, Larry. 2015. ‘Analyzing Complex Negotiations.’ Negotiation Journal 31, no. 2, 131–153.
   DOI: <nenalezeno>
5. Davis, Christina L. 2004. ‘International Institutions and Issue Linkage: Building Support for Agricultural Trade Liberalization.’ American Political Science Review 98, no. 1, 153–169.
   DOI: <nenalezeno>
6. Dür, Andreas and Mateo, Gemma. 2014. ‘Public opinion and interest group in uence: how citizen groups derailed the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement.’ Journal of European Public Policy 21, no. 8, 1199–1217.
   DOI: <nenalezeno>
7. Elsig, Manfred. 2010. ‘WTO decision-making: Can we get a little help from the secretariat and the critical mass?’ In: Redesigning the World Trade Organization for the twenty- rst century. Ed. Debra P. Steger. Ottawa: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 67–90.
   DOI: <nenalezeno>
8. Fearon, James D. 1994. ‘Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes.’ e American Political Science Review 88, no. 3, 577–592.
   DOI: 10.2307/2944796
9. Fearon, James D. 1998. ‘Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation.’ International Organization 52, no. 2, 269–305.
   DOI: <nenalezeno>
10. Fisher, Roger and Ury, William and Patton, Bruce. 1991. Getting to yes: negotiating agreement without giving in. Boston: Houghton Mi in.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
11. Frieden, Je ry A. and Rogowski, Ronald. 1996. ‘ e Impact of the International Economy on National Policies: An Analytical Overview.’ In: Internationalization and Domestic Politics. Eds. Robert O. Keohane and Helen Milner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 25–47.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
12. Galantucci, Robert A. 2013. ‘Who Promotes Protection? Economic and Electoral In uences on Trade-Related Position Taking in the Senate.’ International Interactions 39, no. 5, 672–697.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
13. Goldstein, Judith. 1998. ‘International Institutions and Domestic Politics: GATT, WTO, and the Liberal- ization of International Trade.’ In: e WTO as an International Organization. Ed. Anne O. Krueger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 133–160.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
14. Grossman, Gene and Helpman, Elhanah. 2002. Interest Groups and Trade Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
15. Hausmann, Ricardo and Hidalgo, César A. 2013. e atlas of economic complexity: mapping paths to prosperity (http://www.cid.harvard.edu/documents/complexityatlas.pdf).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
16. Krippendor , Klaus. 2012. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. London: Sage. Krugman, Paul R. and Obstfeld, Maurice. 2003. International Economics (6th ed.). Boston: Addison Wesley.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
17. Lax, David A. and Sebenius, James K. 1986. e Manager as Negotiator: Bargaining for Cooperation and Competitive Gain. New York: Free Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
18. Lax, David A. and Sebenius, James K. 2006. 3-D negotiation: powerful tools to change the game in your most important deals. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
19. Lilja, Jannie. 2012. ‘Domestic-Level Factors and Negotiation. (In)Flexibility in the WTO.’ International Negotiation 17, no. 1, 115–138.
    DOI: 10.1163/157180612X630956
20. Morrow, James D. 1992. ‘Signalling di culties with linkage in crisis bargaining.’ International Studies Quarterly 36, no. 2, 153.
    DOI: 10.2307/2600879
21. Morrow, James D. 1994. ‘Modelling the forms of international cooperation: distribution versus information.’ International Organization 48, no. 3, 387–423.
    DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300028241
22. Morrow, James D. 1999. ‘ e Strategic Setting of Choices: Signalling, Commitment, and Negotiation in International Politics.’ In: Strategic Choice and International Relations. Eds. David A. Lake and Robert Powell. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 77–114.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
23. Muthoo, Abhinay. 2000. ‘A Non-technical Introduction to Bargaining eory.’ World Economics 1, no. 2, 145–166.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
24. Narlikar, Amrita, ed. 2010. Deadlocks in multilateral negotiations: causes and solutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
25. Narlikar, Amrita and Van Houten, Pieter. 2010. ‘Know the enemy: uncertainty and deadlock in the WTO.’ In: Deadlocks in multilateral negotiations: causes and solutions. Ed. Amrita Narlikar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 142–163.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
26. Narlikar, Amrita and Wilkinson, Rorden. 2004. ‘Collapse at the WTO: a Cancun post-mortem.’ ird World Quarterly 25, no. 3, 447–460.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
27. Odell, John S. 2009. ‘Breaking Deadlocks in International Institutional Negotiations: e WTO, Seattle, and Doha.’ International Studies Quarterly 53, no. 2, 273–299.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
28. Odell, John S. 2012. ‘Negotiation and Bargaining.’ In: Handbook of International Relations. Eds. Walter E. Carlsnaes and omas Risse and Beth A. Simmons. London: Sage, 379–400.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
29. Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2011. ‘Why Do Some Countries Get Better WTO Accession Terms an Others?’ International Organization 65, no. 4, 639–672.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
30. Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2013. ‘ e Cost of Wiggle-Room: Looking at the Welfare E ects of Flexibility in Tari Rates at the WTO.’ International Studies Quarterly 57, no. 1, 91–102.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
31. Polity IV Project. 2010. Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2010. Center for Systemic Peace (http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity06.htm).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
32. Putnam, Robert D. 1988. ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: e Logic of Two-Level Games.’ International Organization 42, no. 3, 427–460.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
33. Rae, Douglas. 1968. ‘A Note on the Fractionalization of Some European Party Systems.’ Comparative Political Studies 1, no. 3, 413–418.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
34. Rai a, Howard. 1982. e Art and Science of Negotiation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Rogowski, Ronald. 1989. Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade A ects Domestic Political Alignments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
35. Schelling, omas C. 1960. e Strategy of Con ict. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
36. Schwab, Susan. 2011. ‘A er Doha: Why the Negotiations are Doomed and What We Should Do about It.’ Foreign A airs 90, no. 3, 104–117.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
37. Sebenius, James K. 1992. ‘Negotiation Analysis: A Characterization and Review.’ Management Science 38, no. 1, 18–38.
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.38.1.18
38. Sjöstedt, Gunnar. 2012. ‘NGOs in WTO Talks: Patterns of Performance and What ey Mean.’ International Negotiation 17, no. 1, 91–114.
    DOI: 10.1163/157180612X630947
39. Stephen, Matthew D. 2012. ‘Rising Regional Powers and International Institutions: e Foreign Policy Orientations of India, Brazil and South Africa.’ Global Society 26, no. 3, 289–309.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
40. Stephen, Matthew D. 2014. ‘Rising powers, global capitalism and liberal global governance: A historical materialist account of the BRICs challenge.’ European Journal of International Relations 20, no. 4, 912–938.
    DOI: 10.1177/1354066114523655
41. Tallberg, Jonas. 2010. ‘ e Power of the Chair: Formal Leadership in International Cooperation.’ Interna- tional Studies Quarterly 54, no. 1, 241–265.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
42. e Financial Times. 2008. ‘Doha trade talks collapse. Financial Times.’ .com. 29th July 2008 (http:// www. .com/cms/s/0/0638a320-5d8a-11dd-8129-000077b07658.html#axzz3cBT48mQM).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
43. Tollison, Robert D. and Willett, omas D. 1979. ‘An economic theory of mutually advantageous issue linkages in international negotiations.’ International Organization 33, no. 4, 425–449.
    DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300032252
44. United Nations Development Programme. 2012. International Human Development Indicators (http:// hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
45. Warwick Commission. 2007. e Multilateral Trade Regime: Which Way Forward? Warwick: University of Warwick.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
46. World Bank. 2013. DataBank (http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
47. World Trade Organization. 2001. Doha WTO Ministerial 2001: Ministerial Declaration (http://www.wto. org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min01_e/mindecl_e.htm#organization).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
48. World Trade Organization. 2010. Workshop on Recent Analyses of the Doha Round: Summing Up and Roundtable Discussion (http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dda_e/wkshop_nov10_e/wkshop_ nov10_e.htm).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
49. World Trade Organization. 2013a. Trade pro les: WTO Statistics Database (http://stat.wto.org/CountryPro le/WSDBCountryPFHome.aspx?Language=E).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
50. World Trade Organization. 2013b. Time series: WTO Statistics Database (http://stat.wto.org/StatisticalProgram/WSDBStatProgramHome.aspx?Language=E).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
51. World Trade Organization. 2014. “Bali is just the start” – Azevêdo (https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/ spra_e/spra4_e.htm).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
52. Zartman, I. William. 1994. International Multilateral Negotiation: Approaches to the Management of Complexity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
53. Zartman, I. William. 2008. Negotiation and Con ict Management: Essays on eory and Practice. London: Routledge.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
54. Zürn, Michael and Binder, Martin and Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias. 2012. ‘International Authority and Its Politicization.’ International eory 4, no. 1, 69–106.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>