1. Ames, Barry. 1995. ‘Electoral Rules, Constituency Pressures, and Pork Barrel: Bases of Voting in the Brazilian Congress.’ e Journal of Politics 57, no. 2, 324–343. Ansolabehere, Stephen and Snyder, James. M. 2006. ‘Party Control of State Government and the Distri- bution of Public Expenditures.’ Scandinavian Journal of Economics 108, no. 4, 547–569.
    DOI: 10.2307/2960309
  2. Bernhardt, Dan and Dubey, Sangita and Hughson, Eric. 2004. ‘Term limits and pork barrel politics.’ Journal of Public Economics 88 no. 12, 2383–2422.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.10.008
  3. Bickers, Kenneth N. and Stein, Robert M. 1996. ‘ e Electoral Dynamics of the Federal Pork Barrel.’ American Journal of Political Science 40, no. 4, 1300–1326.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  4. Buiatti, Cesare and Carmeci, Gaetano and Mauro, Luciano. 2014. ‘ e origins of the public debt of Italy: Geographically dispersed interests?’ Journal of Policy Modeling 36, no. 1, 43–62.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2013.10.016
  5. Bullock, Charles S. and Hood, M. V. 2005. ‘When Southern Symbolism Meets the Pork Barrel: Opportu- nity for Executive Leadership.’ Social Science Quarterly 86, no. 1, 69–86.
    DOI: 10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00291.x
  6. Costa-I-Font, Joan and Rodriguez-Orregia, Eduardo and Lunapla, Dario. 2003. ‘Political competition and pork-barrel politics in the allocation of public investment in Mexico.’ Public Choice 116, no. 1–2, 185–204.
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1024263208736
  7. De la Fuente, Angel and Vives, Xavier and Dolado, Juan J. and Faini, Riccardo. 1995. ‘Infrastructure and Education as Instruments of Regional Policy: Evidence from Spain.’ Economic Policy 10, no. 20, 13–51.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  8. De La O, Ana. 2013. ‘Do Conditional Cash Transfers A ect Electoral Behavior? Evidence from a Ran- domized Experiment in Mexico.’ American Journal of Political Science 57, no. 1, 1–14.
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00617.x
  9. DeBacker, Jason. 2010. ‘ e price of pork: e seniority trap in the U.S. House.’ Journal of Public Econom- ics 95, no. 1–2, 63–78.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  10. Del Rossi, Alison F. 1995. ‘ e politics and economics of pork barrel spending: e case of federal nanc- ing of water resources development.’ Public Choice 85, no. 3–4, 285–305.
    DOI: 10.1007/BF01048200
  11. Denemark, David. 2000. ‘Partisan Pork Barrel in Parliamentary Systems: Australian Constituency-Level Grants.’ e Journal of Politics 62, no. 3, 896–915.
    DOI: 10.1111/0022-3816.00039
  12. Denemark, David. 2014. ‘Partisan Pork-Barrel, Independents and Electoral Advantage: Australia’s Re- gional Partnerships Program in 2004.’ Australian Journal of Politics & History 60, no. 4, 564–579. Evans, Diana. 2004. Greasing the Wheels. Using Pork Barrel Projects to Build Majority Coalitions in Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    DOI: 10.1111/ajph.12076
  13. Gaunt, Clive. 1999. ‘Sports Grants and the Political Pork Barrel: An Investigation of Political Bias in the Administration of Australian Sports Grants.’ Australian Journal of Political Science 34, no. 1, 63–74. Golden, Miriam A. and Picci, Lucio. 2008. ‘Pork-Barrel Politics in Postwar Italy, 1953–94.’ American Journal of Political Science 52, no. 2, 268–289.
    DOI: 10.1080/10361149950461
  14. Hazakis, Konstantinos J. and Ioannidis, Panagiotis G. 2014. ‘ e impact of the local government institutional framework on the distribution of intergovernmental grants: Greek Republic as a case study.’ European Journal of Spatial Development (http://www.nordregio.se/Global/EJSD/Refereed%20arti- cles/refereed55.pdf ).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  15. Hoare, Anthony G. 1992. ‘Transport investment and the political pork barrel: a review and the case of Nelson, New Zealand.’ Transport Reviews 12, no. 2, 133–151.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  16. Law 583/2004 about Budgetary Rules of Local Governments.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  17. Levitt, Steven D. and Snyder, James M. 1997. ‘ e Impact of Federal Spending on House Election Out- comes.’ e Journal of Political Economy 105, no. 1, 30–53.
    DOI: 10.1086/262064
  18. Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Nadeau, Richard. 2011. ‘Economic voting theory: Testing new dimensions.’ Electoral Studies 30, no. 2, 288–294.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.09.001
  19. Limosani, Michele and Navarra, Pietro. 2001. ‘Local pork-barrel politics in national pre-election dates: e case of Italy.’ Public Choice 106, no. 3–4, 317–326.
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1005280209630
  20. López de Nava Velasco, Karla. 2004. ‘Economic Performance and Accountability: e Revival of the Economic Vote Function.’ Working paper, CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1453 (http://papers.ssrn. com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=710903).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  21. Luo, Renfu and Zhang, Linxiu and Huang, Jikun and Rozelle, Scott. 2010. ‘Village Elections, Public Goods Investments and Pork Barrel Politics, Chinese-style.’ Journal of Development Studies 46, no. 4, 662–684.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  22. Manacorda, Marco and Miguel, Edward and Vigorito, Andrea. 2011. ‘Government Transfers and Politi- cal Support.’ American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 3, no. 3, 1–28.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  23. Mesežnikov, Grigorij. 2004. ‘National Populism in Slovakia – De ning the Character of the State and In- terpreting Select Historic Events.’ In: National Populism and Slovak – Hungarian Relations in Slovakia 2006 – 2009. Ed. Kálman Petőcz. Šamorín: Forum Minority Research Institute, 39–66.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  24. Milligan, Kevin and Smart, Michael. 2005. ‘Regional Grants as Pork Barrel Politics.’ Working paper, CE- Sifo Working Paper Series No. 1453 (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=710903).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  25. Ministry of Finance. 2005. Decree of Ministry of Finance no. 26825/2005-441 about granting of subsidies by Ministry of Finance (http://www. nance.gov.sk/Default.aspx?CatID=4807).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  26. Ministry of Finance. 2014. Call for Proposals 2014 (http://www. nance.gov.sk/Default.aspx?CatID=9504). Nižňanský, Viktor and Kling, Jaroslav. 2002. ‘Public Administration.’ In: Slovakia 2001. A Global Report on the State of Society. Eds. Grigorij Mesežnikov and Miroslav Kollár and Tom Nicholson. Bratislava: Institute for Public A airs, 167–188.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  27. Nižňanský, Viktor. 2005. Decentralizácia na Slovensku. Government O ce of the Slovak Republic (http:// www.komunal.eu/images/pdf/decentralizacia_bilancia.pdf ).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  28. Oliver, J. Eric and Ha, Shang E. and Callen, Zachary. 2012. Local Elections and the Politics of Small-Scale Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  29. Petőcz, Kálman. 2004. ‘Slovakia since 2004 – National Populism and the Hungarian Issue.’ In: National Populism and Slovak – Hungarian Relations in Slovakia 2006 – 2009. Ed. Kálman Petőcz. Šamorín: Forum Minority Research Institute, 67–98.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  30. Posner, Daniel N. and Simon, David J. 2002. ‘Economic Conditions and Incumbent Support in Africa’s New Democracies: Evidence from Zambia.’ Comparative Political Studies 35, no. 3, 313–336. Roberson, Brian. 2008. ‘Pork-Barrel Politics, Targetable Policies, and Fiscal Federalism.’ Journal of the European Economic Association 6, no. 4, 819–844.
    DOI: 10.1177/0010414002035003003
  31. Rodriguez-Oreggia, Eduardo and Rodriguez-Pose, Andres. 2004. ‘ e Regional Returns of Public Investment Policies in Mexico.’ World Development 32, no. 9, 1545–1562.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  32. Schwartz, omas. 1994. ‘Representation as Agency and the Pork Barrel Paradox.’ Public Choice 78, no. 1, 3–21.
    DOI: 10.1007/BF01053363
  33. Sciara, Gian-Claudia. 2012. ‘Planning for Unplanned Pork. e Consequences of Congressional Earmarking for Regional Transportation Planning.’ Journal of the American Planning Association 78, no. 3, 239–255.
    DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2012.694269
  34. Shepsle, Kenneth A. and Weingast, Barry R. 1981. ‘Political Preferences for the Pork Barrel: A Generalization.’ American Journal of Political Science 25, no. 1, 96–111.
    DOI: 10.2307/2110914
  35. Statistical O ce of the Slovak Republic. 2016. Statistical O ce of Slovak Republic (http://www.statistics. sk).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  36. Statistical O ce of the Slovak Republic. 2001. Census 2001 (http://sodb.infostat.sk/sodb/eng/2001/format.htm).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  37. Statistical O ce of the Slovak Republic. 2011. Census 2011 (http://census2011.statistics.sk/).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  38. Spáč, Peter and Sloboda, Dušan. 2014. Municipalizácia, volebný systém a možnosti participácie v miestnej samospráve na Slovensku. Piešťany: Komunálne výskumné a poradenské centrum, n. o. (http://www. konzervativizmus.sk/upload/regio/Studia_Spac-Sloboda_2014_ nalna_verzia.pdf ).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  39. Veiga, Linda Gonçalves and Veiga, Francisco José. 2013. ‘Intergovernmental scal transfers as pork barrel.’ Public Choice 155, no. 3–4, 335–353.
    DOI: 10.1007/s11127-011-9863-2