1. Akkerman, Tjiske. 2015. ‘Immigration policy and electoral competition in Western Europe. A ne-grained analysis of party positions over the past two decades.’ Party Politics 21, no. 1, 1–23. Akkerman, Tjiske. 2003. ‘Populism and democracy: challenge or pathology?’ Acta Politica 38, no. 2, 147–159. Akkerman, Tjiske and de Lange, Sarah L. 2012. ‘Radical right parties in o ce: incumbency records and the electoral cost of governing.’ Government and Opposition 47, no. 4, 574–596.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  2. Albertazzi, Daniele and McDonnell, Duncan. 2015. Populists in power. New York: Routledge. Albertazzi, Daniele. 2009. ‘Reconciling ‘voice’ and ‘exit’: Swiss and Italian populists in power.’ Politics 29, no. 1, 1–10.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  3. Albertazzi, Daniele and Mueller, Sean. 2013. ‘Populism and liberal democracy: populists in Government in Austria, Italy, Poland and Switzerland.’ Government and Opposition 48, no. 3, 343–371.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  4. Arts, Bas and Verschuren, Piet. 1999. ‘Assessing political in uence in complex decision-making: an instrument based on triangulation.’ International Political Science Review 20, no. 4, 411–424. Bernhard, Laurent and Kriesi, Hanspeter and Weber, Edward. 2015. ‘ e populist discourse of the Swiss People’s Party.’ In: Populism in the shadow of the great recession. Eds. Hanspeter Kriesi and Takis S. Pappas. Colchester: ECPR Press, 125–139.
    DOI: 10.1177/0192512199204006
  5. Betz, Hans-Georg. 2004. ‘La droite populiste en Europe. Extrême et démocrate?’ Pôle Sud 21, 132–134. Betz, Hans-Georg. 2002. ‘Conditions favouring the success and failure of radical right-wing populist parties in contemporary democracies.’ In: Democracies and the populist challenge. Eds. Yves Meny and Yves Surel. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 197–213.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  6. Birkland, omas A. 2005. An introduction to the policy process: theories, concepts and models of public policy making. 2nd Edition. New York: ME Sharpe.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  7. Compston Hugh, ed. 2004. Handbook of public policy in Europe. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  8. De Vries, Catherine E. and Hobolt, Sara B. 2012. ‘When dimensions collide: the electoral success of issue entrepreneurs.’ European Union Politics 13, no. 2, 246–268.
    DOI: 10.1177/1465116511434788
  9. Dür, Andreas and Bernhagen, Partick and Marschall, David. 2015. ‘Interest group success in the European Union: when (and why) does business lose?’ Comparative Political Studies 48, no. 8, 951–983. Gerring, John. 2007. ‘Is there a (viable) crucial-case method?’ Comparative Political Studies 40, no. 3, 231–253. Hampshire, James and Bale, Tim. 2015. ‘New administration, new immigration regime: do parties matter a er all? A UK case study.’ West European Politics 38, no. 1, 145–166.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  10. Huber, Robert A. and, Schimpf, Christian H. 2015. ‘Friend or foe? Testing the in uence of populism on democratic quality in Latin America.’ Political Studies. July 2015 (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/10.1111/1467-9248.12219/abstract).
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  11. Jamin, Jérôme. 2013. ‘Two di erent realities. Notes on populism and the extreme right.’ In: Varieties of right-wing extremism in Europe. Eds. Andrea Mammone and Emmanuel Godin and Brian Jenkins. New York: Routledge, 38–52.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  12. Jamin, Jérôme. 2009. L’imaginaire du complot: discours d’extrême droite en France et aux États-Unis. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  13. Immerzeel, Tim and Pickup, Mark. 2015. ‘Populist radical right parties mobilizing ‘the people’? e role of populist radical right success in voter turnout.’ Electoral studies 40, 347–360.
    DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2015.10.007
  14. Laclau, Ernesto. 2005. On populist reason. London: Verso.
    DOI: <nenalezeno> (CrossRef odpověď z cache uložená 2017-02-22 14:42:48)
  15. Leeman, Lucas. 2015. ‘Political Con ict and Direct Democracy: Explaining Initiative Use 1920–2011.’ Swiss Political Science Review 21, no. 4, 596–616.
    DOI: 10.1111/spsr.12190
  16. Lijphart, Arend. 2012. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in irty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  17. Mansergh, Lucy and omson, Robert. 2007. ‘Election pledges, party competition, and policymaking.’ Comparative Politics 39, no. 3, 311–329.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  18. March, James and Cohen, Michael D. and Olsen, Johan P. 1972. ‘A garbage can model of organizational choice.’ Administration Science Quarterly 17, no. 1, 1–25.
    DOI: 10.2307/2392088
  19. Mazzoleni, Oscar. 2008. Nationalisme et populisme en Suisse: la radicalisation de la «nouvelle» UDC. Lau- sanne: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  20. Minkenberg Michael. 2001. ‘ e radical right in public o ce: agenda-setting and policy e ects.’ West European Politics 24, no. 4, 1–21.
    DOI: 10.1080/01402380108425462
  21. Mudde, Cas. 2007. Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mudde, Cas and Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal. 2013. ‘Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary populism: comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America.’ Government and Opposition 48, no. 2, 147–174.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  22. Norris, Pippa. 2005. Radical right. Voters and parties in the electoral market. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  23. Perisco, Simon and Froio, Caterina and Guinaudeau, Isabelle. 2012. ‘Action publique et partis politiques.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  24. L’analyse de l’agenda législatif français entre 1981 et 2009.’ Gouvernement et action publique 1, no. 1, 11–35.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  25. Pétry, François. 2012. ‘Les partis tiennent-ils leurs promesses?’ In: Les partis politiques québécois dans la tourmente. Mieux comprendre et évaluer leur rôle. Ed. Réjean Pelletier. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval, 95–225.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  26. Pratt, John. 2007. Penal populism. New York: Routledge.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  27. Reynié, Dominique. 2013. Les nouveaux populismes. Paris: Pluriel.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  28. Royed, Terry. 1996. ‘Testing the mandate model in Britain and the United-States.’ British Journal of Political Science 26, no. 1, 45–80.
    DOI: 10.1017/S0007123400007419
  29. Schain, Martin. 2006. ‘ e extreme-right and immigration policy-making: measuring direct and indirect e ects.’ West European Politics 29, no. 2, 270–289.
    DOI: 10.1080/01402380500512619
  30. Schumacher, Gijs and van Kersbergen, Kees. 2016. ‘Do mainstream parties adapt to the welfare chauvinism of populist parties?’ Party Politics 22, no. 3, 300–312.
    DOI: 10.1177/1354068814549345
  31. Sciarini, Pascal. 2014. ‘Processus législatif.’ In: Handbuch der Schweizer politik – Manuel de la politique suisse. Eds. Peter Knoepfel and Yannis Papadopoulos and Pascal Sciarini and Adrian Vatter and Silja Häusermann. Zürich: Verlag Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 527–561.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  32. Skenderovic, Damir. 2009. e radical right in Switzerland. Continuity and change, 1945–2000. NewYork, Oxford: Berghahn Books.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  33. Taggart, Paul. 2004. ‘Populism and representative politics in contemporary Europe.’ Journal of Political Ideologies 9, no. 3, 269–288.
    DOI: 10.1080/1356931042000263528
  34. Taggart, Paul. 2000. Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  35. Taguie , Pierre-André. 2007. L’illusion populiste. Paris: Flammarion.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  36. Urbinati, Nadia. 2014. Democracy dis gured. Opinion, truth, and the people. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  37. van Ostaijen, Mark and Scholten, Peter. 2014. ‘Policy populism? Political populism and migrant integration policies in Rotterdam and Amsterdam.’ Comparative European Politics 12, no. 6, 680–699. Verbeek, Bertjan and Zaslove, Andrej. 2015. ‘ e impact of populist radical right parties on foreign policy: the Northern League as a junior coalition partner in the Berlusconi Governments.’ European Political Science Review 7, no. 4, 525–546.
    DOI: 10.1057/cep.2014.26
  38. Vossen, Koenraad. 2013. Rondom Wilders: portret van de PVV. Amsterdam: Boom.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  39. Walgrave, Stefaan and Lefevere, Jonas and Tresch, Anke. 2012. ‘ e associative dimension of issue ownership.’ Public Opinion Quarterly 76, no. 4, 771–782.
    DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfs023
  40. Williams, Michelle H. 2006. e impact of radical right-wing parties in West European democracies. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  41. Wilson, Carter A. 2008. Public Policy. Continuity and change. Long Grove: Waveland Press.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  42. Wodak, Ruth. 2015. e politics of fear: what right-wing populist discourses mean. London: Sage. Zaslove, Andrej. 2004. ‘Closing the door? e ideology and impact of radical right populism on immigration policy in Austria and Italy.’ Journal of Political ideologies 9, no. 1, 99–118.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>
  43. Zittoun, Philippe. 2014. e political process of policymaking. A pragmatic approach to public policy. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
    DOI: <nenalezeno>