1. Arter, David. 2016. ‘When New Party X has the ‚X Factor‘: On Resilient Entrepreneurial Parties.’ Party Politics 22, no. 1, 15–26. Arter, David and Kestilä-Kekkonen, Elina. 2014. ‘Measuring the Extent of Party Institutionalisation: e Case of a Populist Entrepreneur Party.’ West European Politics 37, no. 5, 932–956.
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813509523
2. Bara, Judith. 2006. ‘Do Parties Re ect Public Concerns?’ In: Democratic Politics and Party Competition. Eds. Judith Bara and Albert Weale. London: Routledge, 105–123.
   <nenalezeno>
3. Barnea, Shlomit and Rahat, Gideon. 2011. ‘Out with the Old in With the “New”: What Constitutes a New Party?’ Party Politics 17, no. 3, 303–320.
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810369148
4. Bågenholm, Andreas and Charron, Nicholas. 2014. ‘Do Politics in Europe Bene t from Politicising Cor- ruption?’ West European Politics 37, no. 5, 903–931.
   https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.909164
5. Beyens, Stefanie and Lucardie, Paul and Deschouwer, Kris. 2016. ‘ e Life and Death of New Political Parties in the Low Countries.’ West European Politics 39, no. 2, 257–277.
   <nenalezeno>
6. Biezen, Ingrid van. 2003. Political Parties in New Democracies: Party Organization in Southern and East-Central Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   <nenalezeno>
7. Biezen, Ingrid van and Mair, Peter and Poguntke, omas. 2012. ‘Going, going ... gone? e Decline of Party Membership in Contemporary Europe.’ European Journal of Political Research 51, no. 1, 24‒56. Bolleyer, Nicole. 2013. New Parties in Old Party Systems. Persistence and Decline in 17 Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.01995.x
8. Bolleyer, Nicole and Van Spanje, Joost and Wilson, Alex. 2012. ‘New Parties in Government: Party Organisation and the Costs of Public O ce.’ West European Politics 35, no. 5, 971–998.
   https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.706407
9. Budge, Ian. 1987. ‘ e Internal Analysis of Election Programmes.’ In: Ideology, Strategy and Party Chan- ge: Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in 19 Democracies. Eds. Ian Budge and David Robertson and Derek Hearl. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 15–38.
   <nenalezeno>
10. Cabada, Ladislav and Hloušek, Vít and Jurek, Petr. 2014. Party Systems in East Central Europe. Lanham: Lexington Book.
    <nenalezeno>
11. Cabada, Ladislav and Tomšič, Matevž. 2016. ‘ e Rise of Person-Based Politics in the New Democracies: e Czech Republic and Slovenia.’ Politics in Central Europe 12, no. 2, 29–50.
    <nenalezeno>
12. Calise, Mauro. 2015. ‘ e Personal Party: An Analytical Framework.’ Italian Political Science Review 45, no. 3, 301–315.
    <nenalezeno>
13. Casal Bértoa, Fernando. 2014. ‘Party Systems and Cleavage Structures Revisited: A Sociological Expla- nation of Party System Institutionalization in East Central Europe.’ Party Politics 20, no. 1, 16–36.
    <nenalezeno>
14. Deželan, Tomaž and Krašovec, Alenka and Kovačič, Matej. 2010. ‘Volilna kampanja po slovensko.’ In: Po- litične vsebine in volilna kampanja: slovenska izkušnja z volitev v Evropski parlament 2009. Ed. Simona Kustec Lipicer. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede, 53–70.
    <nenalezeno>
15. Diamond, Larry. 2011: ‘Why Democracies Survive?’ Journal of Democracy 22, no. 1, 17–30.
    <nenalezeno>
16. DL. 2014. Statute of DL (author’s archive).
    <nenalezeno>
17. DLGV. 2011. Statute of DLGV (author’s archive).
    <nenalezeno>
18. Enyedi, Zsolt and Casal Bértoa, Fernando. 2011. ‘Patterns of Party Competition.’ In: Europeanising Party Politics? Comparative Perspectives on Central and Eastern Europe. Eds. Paul G. Lewis and Radoslaw Markowski. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 16–42.
    <nenalezeno>
19. Eurobarometer. 2011. Special Eurobarometer 374: Corruption Report (http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_374_en.pdf ).
    <nenalezeno>
20. Fink-Hafner, Danica. 1998. ‘Organized Interests in the Policy-Making Process in Slovenia.’ Journal of European Public Policy 5, no. 2, 285–302.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/135017698343992
21. Fink-Hafner, Danica. 2012. ‘Značilnosti razvoja strankarskega sistema v Sloveniji.’ In: Dvajset let slovenske države. Eds. Janko Prunk and Tomaž Deželan. Maribor: Aristej, 193–213.
    <nenalezeno>
22. Fink-Hafner, Danica and Krašovec, Alenka and Kustec Lipicer, Simona and Filej, Živa. 2002. Dejavniki v oblikovanju (ne)zaupanja v državni zbor. Zaključno poročilo. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede. Fink-Hafner, Danica and Krašovec, Alenka. 2013. ‘Factors A ecting the Long-Term Success of New Par- liamentary Parties: Findings in a Post-Communist Context.’ Romanian Journal of Political Science 13, no. 2, 40–68.
    <nenalezeno>
23. Guardiancich, Igor. 2012. ‘ e Uncertain Future of Slovenian Exceptionalism.’ East European Politics and Societies 26, no. 2, 380–399.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325411415518
24. Harmel, Robert 2002. ‘Party Organizational Change: Competing Explanations?’ In: Political Parties in New Europe: Political and Analytical Challenges. Eds. Kurt Richard Luther and Ferdinand Müller-Rommel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 119–142.
    <nenalezeno>
25. Harmel, Robert and Robertson, John D. 1985. ‘ e Formation and Success of New Parties: A Cross-National Analysis.’ International Political Science Review 6, no. 4, 501–523.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/019251218500600408
26. Harmel, Robert and Janda, Kenneth. 1982. Parties and eir Environments: Limits to Reform? New York: Longman.
    <nenalezeno>
27. Harmel, Robert and Janda, Kenneth. 1994. ‘An Integrated eory of Party Goals and Party Change.’ Journal of eoretical Politics 6, no. 3, 259–287.
    <nenalezeno> (CrossRef odpověď z cache uložená 2017-06-14 15:29:58)
28. Haughton, Tim and Deegan-Krause, Kevin. 2010 ‘Hardy Perennials. Parties Which Buck the “Live Fast, Die Young” Norm in Central and Eastern Europe.’ ECPR Joint Session, 12. – 17. April 2010. St. Gallen, Switzerland.
    <nenalezeno>
29. Haughton, Tim and Deegan-Krause, Kevin. 2015. ‘Hurricane Season: Systems of Instability in Central and East European Party Politics.’ East European Politics and Societies and Cultures 29, no. 1, 61‒80. Haughton, Tim and Krašovec, Alenka. 2013. ‘ e 2011 Parliamentary Elections in Slovenia.’ Electoral Studies 32, no. 1, 201–204.
    <nenalezeno>
30. Haute, Emilie van and Paulis, Emilien. 2014. MAPP Dataset [Data set]. Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/ record/61234#.WLAK3PJRJbw).
    <nenalezeno>
31. Hloušek, Vít. 2015. ‘Two Types of Presidentialization in the Party Politics of Central Eastern Europe.’ Italian Political Science Review 45, no. 3, 277–299.
    <nenalezeno>
32. Hopkin, Jonathan and Paolucci, Caterina. 1999. ‘ e Business Firm Model of Party Organisation: Cases from Spain and Italy.’ European Journal of Political Research 35, no. 3, 307–339.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00451
33. Karvonen, Lauri. 2010. e Personalisation of Politics: A Study of Parliamentary Democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press.
    <nenalezeno>
34. Katz, Richard S. and Mair, Peter, eds. 1994. How Parties Organize. London: Sage Publications.
    <nenalezeno>
35. Katz, Richard S. and Mair, Peter. 1995. ‘Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: e Emergence of the Cartel Parties.’ Party Politics 1, no. 1, 5–27.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068895001001001
36. Katz, Richard S. and Mair, Peter. 2009. ‘ e Cartel Party esis: A Restatement.’ Perspectives on Politics 7, no. 4, 753–766.
    <nenalezeno>
37. Klingemann, Hans-Dieter and Ho erbert, Richard I. and Budge, Ian. 1994. Parties, Policies, and Democracy. Boulder: Westview Press.
    <nenalezeno>
38. Kolarič, Zinka. 2012. ‘Dvajset let postopnega spreminjanja slovenske socialne države.’ In: Dvajset let slovenske države. Eds. Janko Prunk and Tomaž Deželan. Maribor: Aristej, 283–298.
    <nenalezeno>
39. Komisija za preprečevanje korupcije. 2011. Redno letno poročilo. Ljubljana: Komisija za preprečevanje korupcije (https://www.kpk-rs.si/sl/korupcija-integriteta-in-etika/analize-raziskave-in-statistika/ ocena-stanja-korupcije-2011).
    <nenalezeno>
40. Kopač, Erik. 2016. ‘V SMC verjamejo, da bodo prepričali z rezultati.’ Delo. 5th April 2016 (http://www. delo.si/novice/politika/v-smc-verjamejo-da-bodo-prepricali-z-rezultati.html).
    <nenalezeno>
41. Krašovec, Alenka. 2000. Moč v političnih strankah. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.
    <nenalezeno>
42. Krašovec, Alenka. 2016a. ‘Almost without Any Innovations: Organizational Structures in Slovenian Parties.’ In: Organizational Structures of Political Parties in Central and Eastern European Countries. Eds. Katarzyna Sobolewska-Myślik and Beata Kosowska-Gąstoł and Piotr Borowiec. Krakow: Jagiello- nian University Press, 419–440.
    <nenalezeno>
43. Krašovec, Alenka. 2016b. ‘Slovenia.’ European Journal of Political Research, Political Data Yearbook 2015 55, no. 1, 237–243.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-8852.12146
44. Krašovec, Alenka and Haughton, Tim. 2011. ‘Money, Organization and the State: e Partial Carteliza- tion of Party Politics in Slovenia.’ Communist and Post-Communist Studies 44, no. 3, 199–209.
    <nenalezeno>
45. Krašovec, Alenka and Haughton, Tim. 2012. ‘Europe and the Parliamentary Elections in Slovenia.’ Work- ing paper No. 69, EPERN Election brie ng (http://www.sussex.ac.uk/sei/research/europeanpartiese- lectionsreferendumsnetwork/epernelectionbrie ngs).
    <nenalezeno>
46. Krašovec, Alenka and Haughton, Tim. 2014a. ‘Predictably Unpredictable: e 2014 Parliamentary Elec- tions in Slovenia.’ EPERN network (http://epern.wordpress.com/2014/07/17/predictably-unpredic- table-the-2014-parliamentary-elections-in-slovenia/).
    <nenalezeno>
47. Krašovec, Alenka and Haughton, Tim. 2014b. ‘Privlačnost novog: nove stranke i promjena stranačkog sustava u Sloveniji.’ Političke analize 5, no. 19, 48–53.
    <nenalezeno>
48. Krašovec, Alenka and Johannsen, Lars. 2016. ‘Recent Developments in Democracy in Slovenia.’ Problems of Post-Communism 63, no. 5–6, 313–322.
    <nenalezeno>
49. Krašovec, Alenka and Johannsen, Lars and Pedersen, Karin Hilmer and Deželan, Tomaž. 2014. ‘Nevar- nost sistemske korupcije v Sloveniji: spodbude in ovire.’ Revija za kriminalistiko in kriminologijo 65, no. 3, 207–220.
    <nenalezeno>
50. Krouwel, André. 2006. ‘Party Models.’ In: Handbook of Party Politics. Eds. Richard S. Katz and William Crotty. London: Sage Publications, 249–269.
    <nenalezeno>
51. Krouwel, André and Lucardie, Paul. 2008, ‘Waiting in the Wings: New Parties in the Netherlands.’ Acta Politica, 43, no. 2–3, 278–307.
    https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2008.9
52. Letna poročila strank. 2016a. Pozitivna Slovenija (http://www.ajpes.si/jolp/podjetje.asp?maticna= 4037022000&id_prikaza=2&id=4026398#porocilo).
    <nenalezeno>
53. Letna poročila strank. 2016b. Socialni demokrati (http://www.ajpes.si/jolp/podjetje.asp?maticna= 5147484000&id_prikaza=2&id=4026374#porocilo).
    <nenalezeno>
54. Letna poročila strank. 2016c. Stranka modernega centra (http://www.ajpes.si/jolp/podjetje.asp?matic- na=4066065000&id_prikaza=2&id=4026372#porocilo).
    <nenalezeno>
55. Letna poročila strank. 2016d. Slovenska demokratska stranka (http://www.ajpes.si/jolp/podjetje.asp?mat- icna=5299446000&id_prikaza=2&id=4026390#porocilo).
    <nenalezeno>
56. Letna poročila strank. 2016e. Zavezništvo Alenke Bratušek (http://www.ajpes.si/jolp/podjetje.asp?matic- na=4065948000&id_prikaza=2&id=4026331#porocilo).
    <nenalezeno>
57. Letna poročila strank. 2016f. Državljanska lista (https://www.ajpes.si/jolp/podjetje.asp?matic- na=4037057000&id_prikaza=2&id=4026371#porocilo).
    <nenalezeno>
58. Lewis, G. Paul, ed. 2001. Party Development and Democratic Change in Post-Communist Europe. e First Decade. London and Portland: Frank Cass & Co Ltd.
    <nenalezeno>
59. Lucardie, Paul. 2000. ‘Prophets, Puri ers and Prolocutors: Toward a eory on the Emergence of New Parties.’ Party Politics 6, no. 2, 175–185.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068800006002003
60. LZJ-PS. 2011. Statute of LZJ-PS (author’s archive).
    <nenalezeno>
61. Mair, Peter. 1994. ‘Party Organizations: From Civil Society to the State.’ In: How Parties Organize. Eds. Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair. London: Sage Publications, 1–22.
    <nenalezeno>
62. Malnar, Brina, ed. 2008. Slovensko javno mnenje 2008/1: Slovensko javno mnenje in mednarodna raziskava vrednot. Datoteka podatkov. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Center za raziskovanje javnega mnenja in množičnih komunikacij. Arhiv družboslovnih podatkov (http://www.adp.fdv.uni-lj.si/opisi/sjm081/). Malnar, Brina, ed. 2011. Slovensko javno mnenje 2011/2: Slovensko javno mnenje in mednarodna raziskava vrednot. Datoteka podatkov. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Center za raziskovanje javnega mnenja in množičnih komunikacij. Arhiv družboslovnih podatkov (http://www.adp.fdv.uni-lj.si/opisi/sjm112/). Mencinger, Jože. 2012. ‘Slovenija med zlomom socializma in krizo kapitalizma.’ In: Dvajset let slovenske države. Eds. Janko Prunk and Tomaž Deželan. Maribor: Aristej, 57–80.
    <nenalezeno>
63. Panebianco, Angelo. 1988. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    <nenalezeno> (CrossRef odpověď z cache uložená 2017-06-16 11:30:35)
64. Poguntke, omas and Webb, Paul. 2007. ‘ e Presidentalization of Politics in Democratic Societies: A Framework for Analysis.’ In: e Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Eds. omas Poguntke and Paul Webb. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–25. Politbarometer. 2005. Politbarometer 9/2005. Ljubljana: Center za raziskovanje javnega mnenja (http:// www.cjm.si/sites/cjm.si/ les/old_pb/pb09_05.pdf).
    <nenalezeno>
65. Politbarometer. 2011. Politbarometer 03/2011. Ljubljana: Center za raziskovanje javnega mnenja (http:// www.cjm.si/sites/cjm.si/ les/ le/raziskava_pb/pb_3_11.pdf ).
    <nenalezeno>
66. Politbarometer. 2013. Politbarometer 11/2013. Ljubljana: Center za raziskovanje javnega mnenja (http:// www.cjm.si/sites/cjm.si/ les/PB11_13.pdf).
    <nenalezeno>
67. PS. 2013. Statute of PS (author’s archive).
    <nenalezeno>
68. Računsko sodišče. 2012a. Revizijsko poročilo za Državljansko listo Gregorja Virana. Ljubljana: Računsko sodišče.
    <nenalezeno>
69. Računsko sodišče. 2012b. Revizijsko poročilo za Listo Zorana Jankovića – Pozitivna Slovenija. Ljubljana: Računsko sodišče.
    <nenalezeno>
70. Računsko sodišče. 2012c. Revizijsko poročilo za Slovensko demokratsko stranko. Ljubljana: Računsko sodišče.
    <nenalezeno>
71. Računsko sodišče. 2015a. Revizijsko poročilo za Demokratično stranko upokojencev Slovenije. Ljubljana: Računsko sodišče.
    <nenalezeno>
72. Računsko sodišče. 2015b. Revizijsko poročilo za Pozitivno Slovenijo. Ljubljana: Računsko sodišče. Računsko sodišče. 2015c. Revizijsko poročilo za Socialne demokrate. Ljubljana: Računsko sodišče. Računsko sodišče. 2015d. Revizijsko poročilo za Stranko Mira Cerarja. Ljubljana: Računsko sodišče. Računsko sodišče. 2015e. Revizijsko poročilo za Zavezništvo Alenke Bratušek. Ljubljana: Računsko sodišče. Sikk, Allan. 2012. ‘Newness as a Winning Formula for New Political Parties.’ Party Politics 18, no. 4, 465–486.
    <nenalezeno>
73. SMC. 2014. Statute of SMC (author’s archive).
    <nenalezeno>
74. SMC. 2015. Statute of SMC (author’s archive).
    <nenalezeno>
75. Strøm, Kaare and Svåsand, Lars, eds. 1997. Challenges to Political Parties: e Case of Norway. Ann Arbour: University of Michigan.
    <nenalezeno>
76. Vehovar, Urban. 2012. ‘Slovenija, arhipelag obmodernosti.’ In: Dvajset let slovenske države. Eds. Janko Prunk and Tomaž Deželan. Maribor: Aristej, 81–111.
    <nenalezeno>
77. Tomšič, Matevž and Prijon, Lea. 2015. ‘Person-Based Politics in Italy and Slovenia: Comparing Cases of Leadership’s Individualization.’ International Social Science Journal 64, 237–248.
    <nenalezeno>
78. Toš, Niko, ed. 1995. Slovensko javno mnenje 1994/2: Slovensko javno mnenje in mednarodna raziskava vrednot. Datoteka podatkov. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Center za raziskovanje javnega mnen- ja in množičnih komunikacij. Arhiv družboslovnih podatkov (http://www.adp.fdv.uni-lj.si/opisi/ sjm952/).
    <nenalezeno>
79. Toš, Niko, ed. 1999. Vrednote v prehodu II: Slovensko javno mnenje 1990–1999. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.
    <nenalezeno>
80. Toš, Niko, ed. 2004. Vrednote v prehodu III: Slovensko javno mnenje 1999–2004. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.
    <nenalezeno>
81. Toš, Niko, ed. 2009. Vrednote v prehodu IV: Slovensko javno mnenje 2004–2009. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.
    <nenalezeno>
82. Toš Niko, ed. 2012. Vrednote v prehodu V: Slovensko javno mnenje 2009–2012. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.
    <nenalezeno>
83. Toš, Niko and Broder, Živa. 2013. Slovensko javno mnenje – SJM 2013, Mednarodna raziskava Razumevanje vloge državljana. Ljubljana: Center za raziskovanje javnega mnenja (http://www.cjm.si/ ul/2013C/GRAFOTEKA_C_2013.pdf ).
    <nenalezeno>
84. Toš, Niko and Malnar, Brina, eds. 1999. Slovensko javno mnenje 1999/3: Slovensko javno mnenje in mednarodna raziskava vrednot. Datoteka podatkov. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Center za raziskovanje javnega mnenja in množičnih komunikacij. Arhiv družboslovnih podatkov (http://www.adp.fdv.uni- lj.si/opisi/sjm993/).
    <nenalezeno>
85. Toš, Niko and Malnar, Brina, eds. 2005. Slovensko javno mnenje 2005/3+4: Slovensko javno mnenje in mednarodna raziskava vrednot. Datoteka podatkov. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Center za razis- kovanje javnega mnenja in množičnih komunikacij. Arhiv družboslovnih podatkov (http://www. adp.fdv.uni-lj.si/opisi/sjm053/).
    <nenalezeno>
86. ZaAB. 2014. Statute of ZaAB (author’s archive). Zavezništvo. 2016. Statute of Zavezništvo (author’s archive).
    <nenalezeno>