1. Adams, James and Clark, Michael and Ezrow, Lawrence and Glasgow, Garrett. 2006. ‘Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties’ Policy Shifts, 1976-1998.’ American Journal of Political Science 50, no. 3, 513–529. Birch, Anthony H. 1980. The British system of government, 4th edition. London: Allen & Unwin. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00199.x 2. Budge, Ian and Newton, Kenneth. 1997. The Politics of the New Europe: Atlantic to Urals. London: Rutledge. 3. Budge, Ian and Hofferbert, Richard, I. 1990. ‘Mandates and policy outputs: U.S. party platforms and federal expenditures.’ American Political Science Review 84, no. 1, 111–131. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963632 4. Chytilek, Roman and Eibl, Otto and Hrbková, Lenka and Zagrapan, Jozef. 2014. ‘Vzhled jako kognitivní zkratka v politickém uvažování: Experimentální studie vlivu stereotypů na hodnocení politiků v prostředí se silnou přítomností politických témat.’ Sociální studia 17, no. 1, 81–108. 5. Craig, Stephen C. and Niemi, Richard G. and Silver, Glenn E. 1990. ‘Political Efficacy and Trust: A Report on the NES Pilot Study Items.’ Political Behavior 12, no. 3, 289–314. 6. Dahl, Robert A. and Stinebrickner, Bruce. 2002. Modern Political Analysis. 6th Edition. London: Pearson Publishing. 7. Dalton, Russell J. 2014. Citizen politics: public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies. Los Angeles: Sage. 8. Dinas, Elias and Gemenis, Kostas. 2010. ‘Measuring parties’ ideological position with manifesto data.’ Party Politics 16, no. 4, 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068809343107 9. Downs, Anthony. 1957. ‘An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy.’ Journal of Political Economy 65, no. 2, 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1086/257897 10. Eibl, Otto. 2010. ‘Volební programy.’ In: Volby do Poslanecké sněmovny 2010. Ed. Stanislav Balík. Brno: CDK, 69–96. 11. Evans, Jocelyn A. J. 2004. Voters & voting: an introduction. London: Sage Publications. 12. Ezrow, Lawrence. 2016. ‘Satisfaction with democracy and voter turnout.’ Party Politics 22, no.1, 3–14. 13. Fiala, Petr and Mareš, Miroslav. 1998. ‘Programatika politických stran.’ Politologický časopis 5, no. 1, 5–20. 14. Gregor, Miloš and Macková, Alena. 2014. ‘Předvolební kampaně 2013: Prohloubení trendů, nebo nástup nových?’ In: Volby do Poslanecké sněmovny 2013. Ed. Vlastimil Havlík. Brno: MUNI Press, 55–72. 15. Hibbing, John R. and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. 1995. Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes Toward American Political Institutions. New York: Cambridge. 16. Laclau, Ernesto and Mouffe, Chantal. 1985. Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso. 17. Laver, Michael and Hunt, W. Ben. 1992. Policy and Party Competition. New York: Routledge. 18. Kačur, Juraj. 2015. Election Pledges in Slovakia. Bachelor Thesis. Masaryk University, Faculty of Social Studies, Brno. 19. Kelley, Stanley. 1960. Political Campaigning: Problems of Creating an Informed Electorate. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. 20. King, Gary and Laver, Michael. 1993. ‘Party Platforms, Mandates, and Government Spending.’ American Political Science Review 87, no. 3, 744–750. 21. Kopeček, Lubomír. 2013. ‘Opoziční smlouvy “za kopečky” I.: Byl pakt ČSSD a ODS z let 1998-2002 demokratickou deviací?’ Středoevropské politické studie 15, no. 2–3, 175–195. 22. Kopeček, Lubomír. 2015. Deformace demokracie? Opoziční smlouva a česká politika 1998-2002. Brno: Barrister & Principal. 23. Kostadinova, Petia. 2013. ‘Democratic performance in post-communist Bulgaria: election pledges and levels of fulfillment, 1997–2005.’ East European Politics 29, no. 2, 190–207. Manifesto Project. Undated. Manifesto project (https://manifestoproject.wzb.eu/). https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2012.747954 24. Mansergh, Lucy and Thomson, Robert. 2007. ‘Election Pledges, Party Competition, and Policymaking.’ Comparative Politics 39, no. 3, 311–329. 25. Mansfeldová, Zdenka. 2003. ‘Obsahová analýza volebních programů českých politických stran.’ In: II. kongres českých politologů. Eds. Vladimíra Dvořáková and Andrea Heroutová. Praha: Česká společnost pro politické vědy, 470–478. 26. Matušková, Anna. 2006. ‘Volební kampaň 2006: nástup politického marketingu do České republiky.’ In: Volby do Poslanecké sněmovny v roce 2006. Eds. Dalibor Čaloud and Tomáš Foltýn and Vlastimil Havlík and Anna Matušková. Brno: CDK, 62–88. 27. Matušková, Anna. 2010. ‘Volební kampaně.’ In: Volby do Poslanecké sněmovny v roce 2010. Ed. Stanislav Balík. Brno: CDK, 97–116. 28. McDonald, Michael and Budge, Ian and Hofferbert, Richard I. 1999. ‘Party mandate theory and time series analysis: a theoretical and methodological response.’ Electoral studies 18, no. 4, 587–596. 29. Mikhaylov, Slava and Laver, Michael and Benoit, Kenneth. 2008. ‘Coder Reliability and Mis-classification in Comparative Manifesto Project Coding.’ Annual meeting of Midwest Political Science Association, 3. –6. April 2008. Chicago, USA. 30. Monroe, Kirsten R., ed. 1991. The Economic Approach to Politics: A Critical Reassessment of the Theory of Rational Action. New York: HarperCollins Publishers. 31. Mumby, Dennis K., ed. 1993. Narrative and social control: Critical perspectives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 32. Ost, David. 2009: ‘The End of Postcommunism. Trade Unions in Eastern Europe’s Future.’ East European Politics and Societies 23, no. 1, 13–33. 33. Parker, Glenn R. 1989. ‘The Role of Constituent Trust in Congressional Elections.’ Public Opinion Quarterly 53, no. 2, 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1086/269502 34. Pétry, François and Collette, Benoît. 2008. ‘Measuring How Political Parties Keep Their promises.’ Working Paper, CAPP - Centre d'analyse des politiques publiques (https://www.capp.ulaval.ca/sites/capp.ulaval.ca/files/cahier_43.doc). 35. Pétry, François. 2015. ‘To What Extent Do Parties Fulfill Their Campaign Promises?’ In: Journal of Parliamentary and Political Law Special Issue. Eds. Richard D. Balasko and Gregory Tardi, 303–316. 36. Rallings, Colin. 1987. The Influence of Election Programmes: Britain and Canada 1945-1979. In: Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analysis of Post-War Election Programs in Nineteen Democracies. Eds. Ian Budge and David Robertson and Derek Hearl. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–14. 37. Ringquist, Evan J. and Dasse, Carl. 2004. ‘Lies, Damned Lies, and Campaign Promises? Environmental Legislation in the 105th Congress.’ Social Science Quarterly 85, no. 2, 400–419. 38. Riker, William H. 1982. Liberalism against Populism: A Confrontation between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman. 39. Roberts, Andrew. 2009. The Quality of Democracy in Eastern Europe: Public Preferences and Policy Reforms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 40. Robertson, David. 1976. A Theory of Party Competition. London: John Wiley & Sons. 41. Royed, Terry J. 1992. Policy Promises and Policy Action in the United States and Great Britain, 1979-1988. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 42. Royed, Terry J. 1996. ‘Testing the Mandate Model in Britain and the United States: Evidence from the Reagan and Thatcher Eras.’ British Journal of Political Science 26, no. 1, 45–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400007419 43. Royed Terry J. and Borrelli, Stephen A. 1997. ‘Political Parties and Public Policy: Social Welfare Policy from Carter to Bush.’ Polity 29, no. 4, 539–563. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235267 44. Royed, Terry J. and Borrelli, Stephen A. 1999. ‘Parties and Economic Policy in the USA: Pledges and Performance, 1976-1992.’ Party Politics 5, no. 1, 115–127. 45. Schedler, Andreas. 1988. ‘The Normative Force of Electoral Promises.’ Journal of Theoretical Politics 10, no. 2, 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692898010002003 46. Smith, Craig A. and Smith, Kathy B. 2000. ‘A Rhetorical Perspective on the 1997 British Party Manifestos.’ Political Communication 17, no. 4, 457–473. 47. Somer-Topcu, Zeynep. 2009. Timely Decisions: ‘The Effects of Past National Elections on Party Policy Change.’ The Journal of Politics 71, no. 1, 238–248. 48. Stimson, James A. and MacKuen, Michael B. and Erikson, Robert S. 1995. ‘Dynamic Representation.’ American Political Science Review 89, no. 3, 543–565. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082973 49. Stokes, Susan C. 2004. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 50. Sulkin, Tracy. 2009. ‘Campaign Appeals and Legislative Action.’ The Journal of Politics 71, no. 3, 1093–1108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609090902 51. Sullivan, John L. and O’Connor, Robert E. 1972. ‘Electoral Choice and Popular Control of Public Policy: The Case of the 1966 House Elections.’ American Political Science Review 66, no. 4, 1256–1268. 52. Svačinová, Petra. 2016. ‘Slibem nezarmoutíš? Naplňování socioekonomických legislativních slibů českých vládních stran (2006–2015).’ Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 52, no. 5, 709–736. 53. Škvrňák, Michael. 2015. ‘Election Pledges in the Czech Republic (2010-2013).’ Politologický časopis 22, no. 3, 216–237. 54. Thomassen, Jacques, ed. 2005. The European voter: a comparative study of modern democracies. New York: Oxford University Press. 55. Thome, Helmut. 1999. ‘Party mandate theory and time-series analysis: a methodological comment.’ Electoral Studies 18, no. 4, 569–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00015-3 56. Thomson, Robert. 1999. The Party Mandate: Election Pledges and Government Actions in the Netherlands, 1986-1998. PhD Thesis. University of Groningen. 57. Thomson, Robert. 2001. ‘The Programme to Policy Linkage: The Fulfillment of Election Pledge on Socio-economic Policy in the Netherlands, 1986-1998.’ European Journal of Political Research 40, no. 2, 171–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00595 58. Volby.cz. 2013. Election to the Chamber of Deputies of the Parliament of the Czech Republic held on 25 – 26 October 2013, results (http://www.volby.cz/pls/ps2013/ps2?xjazyk=EN). 59. Volkens, Andrea and Lehmann, Pola and Merz, Nicolas and Regel, Sven and Werner, Annika. 2013. The Manifesto Document Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).