Ágh, A. (1997). Defeat and success as promoters of party change: the Hungarian Socialist Party after two abrupt changes. Party Politics, 3(7), 427–444. Ágh, A. (2000). Party formation and the 1998 elections in Hungary: defeat as promotor of change for the HSP. East European Politics and Societies, 14(2), 285–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068897003003009 Anderson, C. J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Listhaug, O. (2005). Losers’ Consent. Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance theory: progress and problems. In R. P. Abelson, Theories of cognitive consistency: A source book (pp. 5–27). Chicago: Rand McNally. Bachryj-Krzywaźnia, M. (2018). Fabuła porażki – partyjne narracje o przegranych wyborach [The story of defeat – party narratives on lost elections]. In A. Pacześniak, Anatomia porażki wyborczej [Anatomy of electoral defeat] (pp. 89–110). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe. Bell, S. (2011). Do We Really Need a New ‘Constructivist Institutionalism’ to Explain Institutional Change?. British Journal of Political Science, 41(4), 883–906. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123411000147 Bodio, T. (1989). Świadomość a zachowania polityczne [Consciousness and political behaviour]. Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy Związków Zawodowych. Bolleyer, N. (2013). New Parties in Old Party Systems. Persistence and Decline in Seventeen Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bréchon, P., & Cautrès, B. (1998). La cuisante défaite de la droite modérée. In P. Perrineau & C. Ysmal, La vote surprise: les élections législatives des 25 mai et 1er juin 1997 (pp. 225–251). Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Bruner, J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Bruner, J. (2004). Life as narrative. Social Research, 71(3), 691–710. Buffotot, P., & Hanley, D. (1998). Chronique d’une défaite annoncée: les élections législatives des 25 mai et 1er juin 1997. Modern and Contemporary France, 6(1), 5–19. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oakes: SAGE Publications. Della Porta, D., & Keating, M. (2006). How many approaches in the social science? An epistemological introduction. In D. Della Porta & M. Keating, Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. A pluralist Perspective (pp. 1–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Deschouwer, K. (1992). The Survival of the Fittest. Measuring and Explaining Adaptation and Change of Political Parties. Paper presented at the ECPR-Workshop on Democracies and the Organization of Political Parties. Dupoirier, E., & Grunberg, G. (Eds.). (1986). Mars 1986: la drôle de défaite de la gauche. Paris: PUF. Easton, D. (1957). An Approach to the Analysis of Political Systems. World Politics, 9(3), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.2307/2008920 Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2008). Social cognition: from brains to culture. New York: McGraw Hill. Gauja, A. (2017). Party Reform: The Causes, Challenges and Consequences of Organizational Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gherghina, S. (2014). Party Organization and Electoral Volatility in Central and Eastern Europe. Enhancing voter loyalty. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Gherghina, S., & von dem Berge, B. (2018). When Europeanisation meets organisation: enhancing the rights of party members in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Integration, 40(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2017.1418868 Harmel, R. (2002). Party Organizational Change. Competing Explanations? In K. R. Luther & F. Müller-Rommel, Political Parties in the New Europe. Political and Analytical Challenges (pp. 119–142). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Harmel, R., & Janda, K. (1994). An integrated theory of party goals and party change. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(3), 259–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692894006003001 Harmel, R., & Svåsand, L. (1993). Party Leadership and Party Institutionalisation: Three Phases of Development. West European Politics, 16(2), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389308424961 Herbut, R. (2002). Teoria i praktyka funkcjonowania partii politycznych [Theory and practice of political parties]. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego. Horsney, M. J. (2008). Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: a historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.x Janda, K. (1990). Toward a Performance Theory of Change in Political Parties. Paper presented at the 12th World Congress of the International Sociological Association. Retrieved from http://www.janda.org/bio/parties/papers/Janda%20(1990).pdf. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185 Louault, F. (2011). Les défaites électorales. Le cas du Parti des travailleurs dans le Rio Grande do Sul (Brésil) 1982–2008 (Doctoral dissertation). Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Paris, Paris, France. Mercer, J. (2005). Prospect Theory and Political Science. Annual Review of Political Science, 8(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104911 Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076486 Norris, P., & Lovenduski, J. (2004). Why Parties Fail to Learn. Electoral Defeat, Selective Perception and British Party Politics. Party Politics, 10(1), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068804039122 Pacześniak, A. (2018). Porażka wyborcza jako katalizator zmian w partiach politycznych – wprowadzenie teoretyczne [Electoral defeat as catalyst of changes in political parties – theoretical introduction]. In A. Pacześniak, Anatomia porażki wyborczej [Anatomy of electoral defeat] (pp. 7–18). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe. Paldam, M., & Skott, P. (1995). A Rational-Voter Explanation of the Cost of Ruling. Public Choice, 83(1–2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047690 Panebianco, A. (1988). Political Parties. Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Polkinghorne, D. E. (2003). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. In A. J. Hatch & R. Wisniewski, Life History and Narrative (pp. 5–24). London: The Falmer Press. Rose, R., & Mackie, T. T. (1988). Do parties persist or fail? The big trade-off facing organizations. In K. Lawson & P. H. Merkl, When Parties Fail. Emerging Alternative Organizations (pp. 533–558). Princeton: Princeton University Press. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Schumacher, G., Van de Wardt, M., Vis, B., & Klitgaard, M. B. (2015). How aspiration to office conditions the impact of government participation on party platform change. American Journal of Political Science, 59(4), 1040–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12174 Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting Qualitative Data. London: Sage Publications. Somer-Topcu, Z. (2009). Timely Decisions: The Effects of Past National Elections on Party Policy Change. The Journal of Politics, 71(1), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608090154 Stemplewska-Żakowicz, K., & Zalewski, B. (2010). Czym jest dobra narracja? Struktura narracji z perspektywy badaczy i klinicystów [What is a good narrative? Narrative structure from researchers and clinician’s perspective]. In M. Straś-Romanowska, B. Bartosz, & M. Żurkow, Badania narracyjne w psychologii [Narrative research in psychology] (pp. 17–51). Warszawa: ENETEIA Wydawnictwo Psychologii i Kultury. Tavits, M. (2013). Post-communist Democracies and Party Organization. New York: Cambridge University Press. Trzebiński, J. (2002). Narracyjne konstruowanie rzeczywistości [Narrative construction of reality]. In J. Trzebiński, Narracja jako sposób rozumienia świata [Narrative as a way to understand the world] (pp. 17–42). Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne. Wojciszke, B., & Doliński, D. (2008). Psychologia społeczna [Social Psychology]. In J. Strelau & D. Do­liński, Psychologia. Podręcznik akademicki [Psychology. Academic Handbook] (pp. 293–448). Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne. Wolosin, R. J., Sherman, S. J., & Till, A. (1973). Effects of cooperation and competition on responsibility attribution after success and failure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9(3), 220–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(73)90011-5 Yanow, D. (2003). Interpretive Empirical Political Science: What Makes This Not a Subfield of Qualitative Methods. Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 9–13. Zuckerman, M. (1979). Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: the motivational bias is still alive and well. Journal of Personality, 47(2), 245–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1979.tb00202.x